These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23680520)
1. Surgical outcome of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymph node dissections compared with transperitoneal approach in gynecologic cancer patients. Morales S; Zapardiel I; Grabowski JP; Hernandez A; Diestro MD; Gonzalez-Benitez C; De Santiago J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 23680520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies. Köhler C; Klemm P; Schau A; Possover M; Krause N; Tozzi R; Schneider A Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 15385110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Dargent D; Ansquer Y; Mathevet P Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 10739695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Akladios C; Ronzino V; Schrot-Sanyan S; Afors K; Fernandes R; Baldauf JJ; Wattiez A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 25460316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for lymph node recurrence in gynecologic malignancy. Gil-Moreno A; Franco-Camps S; Díaz-Feijoo B; Pérez-Benavente A; Martínez-Palones JM; Del Campo JM; Parera M; Verges R; Castellví J; Xercavins J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 18607826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies. Dottino PR; Tobias DH; Beddoe A; Golden AL; Cohen CJ Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 10366464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers: feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of isolated and combined procedures. Bats AS; Mimouni M; Bensaïd C; Seror J; Douay-Hauser N; Nos C; Lécuru F Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1486-92. PubMed ID: 25191875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients. Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E; Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer. Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]