BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

755 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23680830)

  • 1. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial.
    Davis RJ; Errico TJ; Bae H; Auerbach JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
    Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Year Follow-up of the Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization vs Instrumented Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Stenosis.
    Bae HW; Davis RJ; Lauryssen C; Leary S; Maislin G; Musacchio MJ
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Aug; 79(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 27050538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Schnake KJ; Schaeren S; Jeanneret B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16481955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A minimum 5-year follow-up study.
    Yuan W; Su QJ; Liu T; Yang JC; Kang N; Guan L; Hai Y
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 35():24-29. PubMed ID: 27815024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.
    Schaeren S; Broger I; Jeanneret B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):E636-42. PubMed ID: 18708915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The safety and efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft for posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis: minimum 4-year follow-up of a pilot study.
    Vaccaro AR; Whang PG; Patel T; Phillips FM; Anderson DG; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Brower RS; Kurd MF; Appannagari A; Patel M; Fischgrund JS
    Spine J; 2008; 8(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 17588821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interlaminar stabilization for spinal stenosis in the Medicare population.
    Grinberg SZ; Simon RB; Dowe C; Brecevich AT; Cammisa FP; Abjornson C
    Spine J; 2020 Dec; 20(12):1948-1959. PubMed ID: 32659365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a total posterior arthroplasty prosthesis: implant description, surgical technique, and a prospective report on 29 patients.
    McAfee P; Khoo LT; Pimenta L; Capuccino A; Sengoz A; Coric D; Hes R; Conix B; Asgarzadie F; Hamzaoglu A; Mirofsky Y; Anekstein Y
    Neurosurg Focus; 2007 Jan; 22(1):E13. PubMed ID: 17608334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilisation compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li AM; Li X; Yang Z
    Int J Surg; 2017 Apr; 40():60-67. PubMed ID: 28254421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment.
    Bae HW; Lauryssen C; Maislin G; Leary S; Musacchio MJ
    Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():15. PubMed ID: 26056630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients.
    Di Silvestre M; Lolli F; Bakaloudis G; Parisini P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 20081518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
    Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results.
    Welch WC; Cheng BC; Awad TE; Davis R; Maxwell JH; Delamarter R; Wingate JK; Sherman J; Macenski MM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2007 Dec; 22(1):E8. PubMed ID: 17608342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.