These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23681026)

  • 21. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The contributions of William F. House to the field of implantable auditory devices.
    Eisenberg LS
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():52-6. PubMed ID: 25159272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
    Zheng Y; Soli SD; Tao Y; Xu K; Meng Z; Li G; Wang K; Zheng H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Nov; 75(11):1418-26. PubMed ID: 21893351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The past, present, and future of cochlear prostheses.
    Spelman FA
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 10337561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. History of cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants.
    Møller AR
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():1-10. PubMed ID: 16891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children.
    Schramm B; Bohnert A; Keilmann A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1673-81. PubMed ID: 19775758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Otosclerosis: selection of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Matterson AG; O'Leary S; Pinder D; Freidman L; Dowell R; Briggs R
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 17468676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Lehnert T; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clarion cochlear implant: phase I investigational results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Haggerty HS
    Am J Otol; 1993 May; 14(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 8372924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.
    Roche JP; Hansen MR
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2015 Dec; 48(6):1097-116. PubMed ID: 26443490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preliminary results on correlation between neural response imaging and 'most comfortable levels' in cochlear implantation.
    Akin I; Kuran G; Saka C; Vural M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Apr; 120(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 16623968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
    Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrode migration after cochlear implantation.
    Connell SS; Balkany TJ; Hodges AV; Telischi FF; Angeli SI; Eshraghi AA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 18090097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.