194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23681301)
1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials comparing suture anastomosis to stapled anastomosis for ileostomy closure.
Sajid MS; Craciunas L; Baig MK; Sains P
Tech Coloproctol; 2013 Dec; 17(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 23681301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hand-Sewn versus Stapled Closure of Loop Ileostomy: A Meta-Analysis.
Madani R; Day N; Kumar L; Tilney HS; Gudgeon AM
Dig Surg; 2019; 36(3):183-194. PubMed ID: 29514142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Löffler T; Rossion I; Gooßen K; Saure D; Weitz J; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2015 Feb; 400(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25539702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stapled vs hand suture closure of loop ileostomy: a meta-analysis.
Gong J; Guo Z; Li Y; Gu L; Zhu W; Li J; Li N
Colorectal Dis; 2013; 15(10):e561-8. PubMed ID: 24033921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resections: an integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.
Farag S; Rehman S; Sains P; Baig MK; Sajid MS
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1050-1057. PubMed ID: 29028289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Slesser AA; Pellino G; Shariq O; Cocker D; Kontovounisios C; Rasheed S; Tekkis PP
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):667-76. PubMed ID: 27554096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis.
Leung TT; MacLean AR; Buie WD; Dixon E
J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 May; 12(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 18071833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reversal of loop ileostomy under an Enhanced Recovery Programme - Is the stapled anastomosis technique still better than the handsewn technique?
Markides GA; Wijetunga I; McMahon M; Gupta P; Subramanian A; Anwar S
Int J Surg; 2015 Nov; 23(Pt A):41-5. PubMed ID: 26403069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials comparing purse-string vs conventional linear closure of the wound following ileostomy (stoma) closure.
Sajid MS; Bhatti MI; Miles WF
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2015 May; 3(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 25011379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early Versus Late Preventive Ileostomy Closure Following Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Cheng Z; Dong S; Bi D; Wang Y; Dai Y; Zhang X
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Jan; 64(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 33306538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of handsewn versus stapled reversal of loop ileostomy.
Markides GA; Wijetunga IU; Brown SR; Anwar S
ANZ J Surg; 2015 Apr; 85(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 24920298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040).
Löffler T; Rossion I; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Koch M; von Frankenberg M; Pochhammer J; Thomusch O; Kijak T; Simon T; Mihaljevic AL; Krüger M; Stein E; Prechtl G; Hodina R; Michal W; Strunk R; Henkel K; Bunse J; Jaschke G; Politt D; Heistermann HP; Fußer M; Lange C; Stamm A; Vosschulte A; Holzer R; Partecke LI; Burdzik E; Hug HM; Luntz SP; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Weitz J;
Ann Surg; 2012 Nov; 256(5):828-35; discussion 835-6. PubMed ID: 23095628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of Early Versus Standard Closure of Diverting Ileostomy After Proctectomy: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Emile SH; Horesh N; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Ray-Offor E; Wexner SD
Ann Surg; 2024 Apr; 279(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 37788345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie AE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004320. PubMed ID: 17636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie A; Fitzgerald A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD004320. PubMed ID: 21901690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Hasegawa H; Radley S; Morton DG; Keighley MR
Ann Surg; 2000 Feb; 231(2):202-4. PubMed ID: 10674611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
Lustosa SA; Matos D; Atallah AN; Castro AA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003144. PubMed ID: 11687041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversal of Diverting Loop Ileostomy Using Hand-Sewn Side-to-Side
Prassas D; Ntolia A; Spiekermann JD; Rolfs TM; Schumacher FJ
Am Surg; 2018 Nov; 84(11):1741-1744. PubMed ID: 30747626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
Neutzling CB; Lustosa SA; Proenca IM; da Silva EM; Matos D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003144. PubMed ID: 22336786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective comparison of three techniques.
Lord I; Reeves L; Gray A; Woodfield J; Clifford K; Thompson-Fawcett M
ANZ J Surg; 2020 Sep; 90(9):1632-1636. PubMed ID: 32419283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
