These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Interobserver reliability of the young-burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring. Koo H; Leveridge M; Thompson C; Zdero R; Bhandari M; Kreder HJ; Stephen D; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 18594301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: Experiences from two level 1 trauma centres. Gabbe BJ; Esser M; Bucknill A; Russ MK; Hofstee DJ; Cameron PA; Handley C; de Steiger RN Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1396-401. PubMed ID: 24078539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT-generated radiographs in patients with pelvic ring injury: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs? Abdelfattah AA; Moed BR J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Feb; 11():26. PubMed ID: 26898717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional versus virtual radiographs of the injured pelvis and acetabulum. Bishop JA; Rao AJ; Pouliot MA; Beaulieu C; Bellino M Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 26009268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture displacement of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries: Which measurement methods are reliable and does displacement correlate with adverse events? Orthopaedic Trauma Research (OTR) Group Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Oct; 34(7):3553-3559. PubMed ID: 37991594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures. O'Toole RV; Cox G; Shanmuganathan K; Castillo RC; Turen CH; Sciadini MF; Nascone JW J Orthop Trauma; 2010 May; 24(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 20418733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examination under anesthetic for occult pelvic ring instability. Sagi HC; Coniglione FM; Stanford JH J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Sep; 25(9):529-36. PubMed ID: 21857421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of standard roentgenograms in the evaluation of instability of pelvic ring disruption. Edeiken-Monroe BS; Browner BD; Jackson H Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Mar; (240):63-76. PubMed ID: 2917446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can experts in acetabular fracture care determine hip stability after posterior wall fractures using plain radiographs and computed tomography? Davis AT; Moed BR J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Oct; 27(10):587-91. PubMed ID: 23287759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. Jones GL; Bishop JY; Lewis B; Pedroza AD; Am J Sports Med; 2014 May; 42(5):1176-81. PubMed ID: 24573571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of sagittal computed tomography and plain film radiography in a scaphoid fracture model. Temple CL; Ross DC; Bennett JD; Garvin GJ; King GJ; Faber KJ J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15925164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]