181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23682331)
1. Application of smoothing methods for determining of the effecting factors on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients.
Noorkojuri H; Hajizadeh E; Baghestani A; Pourhoseingholi M
Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Feb; 15(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 23682331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic factors in gastric cancer using log-normal censored regression model.
Pourhoseingholi MA; Moghimi-Dehkordi B; Safaee A; Hajizadeh E; Solhpour A; Zali MR
Indian J Med Res; 2009 Mar; 129(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 19491418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Smoothing Techniques for Fitting the Nonlinear Effect of Covariate in Cox Models.
Roshani D; Ghaderi E
Acta Inform Med; 2016 Feb; 24(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 27041809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients using additive hazards regression models.
Maroufizadeh S; Hajizadeh E; Baghestani AR; Fatemi SR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1697-702. PubMed ID: 22126547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients using additive hazards regression models.
Maroufizadeh S; Hajizadeh E; Baghestani AR; Fatemi SR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):901-7. PubMed ID: 21790223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparison of alternative smoothing methods for fitting non-linear exposure-response relationships with Cox models in a simulation study.
Govindarajulu US; Malloy EJ; Ganguli B; Spiegelman D; Eisen EA
Int J Biostat; 2009 Jan; 5(1):Article 2. PubMed ID: 20231865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using fractional polynomials and restricted cubic splines to model non-proportional hazards or time-varying covariate effects in the Cox regression model.
Austin PC; Fang J; Lee DS
Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):612-624. PubMed ID: 34806210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing smoothing techniques in Cox models for exposure-response relationships.
Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Thurston SW; Ganguli B; Eisen EA
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(20):3735-52. PubMed ID: 17538974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Cox regression and parametric models for survival of patients with gastric carcinoma.
Pourhoseingholi MA; Hajizadeh E; Moghimi Dehkordi B; Safaee A; Abadi A; Zali MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 18159979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the effect of quantitative and qualitative predictors on gastric cancer individuals survival using hierarchical artificial neural network models.
Amiri Z; Mohammad K; Mahmoudi M; Parsaeian M; Zeraati H
Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Jan; 15(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 23486933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Log-normal censored regression model detecting prognostic factors in gastric cancer: a study of 3018 cases.
Wang BB; Liu CG; Lu P; Latengbaolide A; Lu Y
World J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jun; 17(23):2867-72. PubMed ID: 21734796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival models using restrictive cubic spline functions.
Bolard P; Quantin C; Abrahamowicz M; Esteve J; Giorgi R; Chadha-Boreham H; Binquet C; Faivre J
J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 12665210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival analysis in gastric cancer: a multi-center study among Iranian patients.
Talebi A; Mohammadnejad A; Akbari A; Pourhoseingholi MA; Doosti H; Moghimi-Dehkordi B; Agah S; Bahardoust M
BMC Surg; 2020 Jul; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32660458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A partial likelihood approach to smooth estimation of dynamic covariate effects using penalised splines.
Brown D; Kauermann G; Ford I
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 17623348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Application of restricted cube spline in cox regression model].
Wei Y; Zhou JH; Zhang ZW; Tan QY; Zhang MY; Li J; Shi XM; Lyu YB
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 54(10):1169-1173. PubMed ID: 32842720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of gastric cancer survival: using an artificial hierarchical neural network.
Amiri Z; Mohammad K; Mahmoudi M; Zeraati H; Fotouhi A
Pak J Biol Sci; 2008 Apr; 11(8):1076-84. PubMed ID: 18819544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression on prognostic factors in gastric cancer.
Moghimi-Dehkordi B; Safaee A; Tabei SZ
East Afr J Public Health; 2009 Apr; 6 Suppl(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 20084981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer.
Zhu HP; Xia X; Yu CH; Adnan A; Liu SF; Du YK
BMC Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21211058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival in gastric cancer patients: univariate and multivariate analysis.
Moghimi-Dehkordi B; Safaee A; Ghiasi S; Zali MR
East Afr J Public Health; 2009 Apr; 6 Suppl(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 20084985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison between Accelerated Failure-time and Cox Proportional Hazard Models in Analyzing the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients.
Zare A; Hosseini M; Mahmoodi M; Mohammad K; Zeraati H; Holakouie Naieni K
Iran J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 44(8):1095-102. PubMed ID: 26587473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
