BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23682541)

  • 1. Motor evoked potential response latencies demonstrate moderate correlations with height and limb length in healthy young adults.
    Livingston SC; Friedlander DL; Gibson BC; Melvin JR
    Neurodiagn J; 2013 Mar; 53(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 23682541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy elderly people.
    Matamala JM; Núñez C; Lera L; Verdugo RJ; Sánchez H; Albala C; Castillo JL
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Dec; 30(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 23767989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.
    Livingston SC; Goodkin HP; Ingersoll CD
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Dec; 24(6):427-36. PubMed ID: 21110222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-rater reliability of a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to obtain motor evoked potentials.
    Livingston SC; Ingersoll CD
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 118(2):239-56. PubMed ID: 18205080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and evoked pressure curves (EPC) from the urethral compressive musculature (UCM) by functional magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers and patients with neurogenic incontinence.
    Schmid DM; Curt A; Hauri D; Schurch B
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 15616965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortico-conus motor conduction time (CCCT) for leg muscles.
    Matsumoto H; Hanajima R; Shirota Y; Hamada M; Terao Y; Ohminami S; Furubayashi T; Nakatani-Enomoto S; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1930-3. PubMed ID: 20471309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of sex, height and age on motor evoked potentials with magnetic stimulation.
    Tobimatsu S; Sun SJ; Fukui R; Kato M
    J Neurol; 1998 May; 245(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 9617705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor evoked potentials and central motor conduction: studies of transcranial magnetic stimulation with recording from the leg.
    Booth KR; Streletz LJ; Raab VE; Kerrigan JJ; Alaimo MA; Herbison GJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Feb; 81(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 1705220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prolonged central motor conduction time of lower limb muscle in spinocerebellar ataxia 6.
    Chen JT; Lin YY; Lee YC; Soong BW; Wu ZA; Liao KK
    J Clin Neurosci; 2004 May; 11(4):381-3. PubMed ID: 15080952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normal parameters for diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation using a parabolic coil with biphasic pulse stimulation.
    Jitsakulchaidej P; Wivatvongvana P; Kitisak K
    BMC Neurol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):510. PubMed ID: 36585660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory afferent inhibition within and between limbs in humans.
    Bikmullina R; Bäumer T; Zittel S; Münchau A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 19136299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A preliminary investigation of motor evoked potential abnormalities following sport-related concussion.
    Livingston SC; Saliba EN; Goodkin HP; Barth JT; Hertel JN; Ingersoll CD
    Brain Inj; 2010; 24(6):904-13. PubMed ID: 20433286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AAEM minimonograph #35: Clinical experience with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Eisen AA; Shtybel W
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Nov; 13(11):995-1011. PubMed ID: 2233862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vitamin B12 status does not influence central motor conduction time in asymptomatic elderly people: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Matamala JM; Nuñez C; Verdugo RJ; Lera L; Sánchez H; Albala C; Castillo JL
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2014 Sep; 31(3):136-40. PubMed ID: 24694205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Afferent regulation of leg motor cortex excitability after incomplete spinal cord injury.
    Roy FD; Yang JF; Gorassini MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Apr; 103(4):2222-33. PubMed ID: 20181733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response competition in the primary motor cortex: corticospinal excitability reflects response replacement during simple decisions.
    Michelet T; Duncan GH; Cisek P
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 20445034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex-specific reference values for total, central, and peripheral latency of motor evoked potentials from a large cohort.
    Cantone M; Lanza G; Fisicaro F; Bella R; Ferri R; Pennisi G; Waterstraat G; Pennisi M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1152204. PubMed ID: 37362949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An age-related change in the ipsilateral silent period of a small hand muscle.
    Petitjean M; Ko JY
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Feb; 124(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 22883478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of sustained excitability of the leg motor cortex after transcranial magnetic stimulation in associative plasticity.
    Roy FD; Norton JA; Gorassini MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 98(2):657-67. PubMed ID: 17537908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.
    van Hedel HJ; Murer C; Dietz V; Curt A
    J Neurol; 2007 Aug; 254(8):1089-98. PubMed ID: 17431701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.