BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23682721)

  • 21. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
    Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
    Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term.
    Bodner-Adler B; Bodner K; Pateisky N; Kimberger O; Chalubinski K; Mayerhofer K; Husslein P
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2005 Apr; 117(7-8):287-92. PubMed ID: 15926620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?
    Wennerholm UB; Hagberg H; Brorsson B; Bergh C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 19140042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation among amniotic fluid index (AFI), cesarean section rate, and labor length in inducted pregnancies beyond 41 weeks' gestation with unfavorable cervix.
    Rizzo N; Farina A; Santarsiero G; Morano D; Vitarelli M; Caramelli E; Carinci P; Bovicelli L
    Am J Perinatol; 2000; 17(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 11144315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.
    Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy.
    Suzuki S; Otsubo Y; Sawa R; Yoneyama Y; Araki T
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 49(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10629368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Economic analysis comparing induction of labor and expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (PPROMEXIL trial).
    Vijgen SM; van der Ham DP; Bijlenga D; van Beek JJ; Bloemenkamp KW; Kwee A; Groenewout M; Kars MM; Kuppens S; Mantel G; Molkenboer JF; Mulder AL; Nijhuis JG; Pernet PJ; Porath M; Woiski MD; Weinans MJ; van Wijngaarden WJ; Wildschut HI; Akerboom B; Sikkema JM; Willekes C; Mol BW; Opmeer BC;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 24392746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Olivier F; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 12798542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial.
    Nielsen PE; Howard BC; Hill CC; Larson PL; Holland RH; Smith PN
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jul; 18(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16105793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pregnancies past the estimated date of confinement: labour and delivery outcome.
    Al-Taani M
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003; 9(5-6):955-60. PubMed ID: 16450525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Postterm pregnancy: putting the merits of a policy of induction of labor into perspective.
    Hannah ME; Huh C; Hewson SA; Hannah WJ
    Birth; 1996 Mar; 23(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 8703252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
    Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
    Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes.
    Larrañaga-Azcárate C; Campo-Molina G; Pérez-Rodríguez AF; Ezcurdia-Gurpegui M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18231888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial.
    Kashanian M; Akbarian A; Baradaran H; Samiee MM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 62(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 16534210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized trial of induction at 42 weeks gestation versus expectant management for postdates pregnancies.
    Witter FR; Weitz CM
    Am J Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 4(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 3300672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix.
    Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Lahav E; Horowitz E; Hod M; Kaplan B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Oct; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15358459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.