These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23682771)

  • 21. Bilateral Asymmetry of Nutrient Foramen Position in Forearm Bones: Implications for its Use in Sorting Commingled Remains.
    Vehit U; Christensen AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):186-189. PubMed ID: 29975981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reliability of osteometric techniques for the sex determination of burned human skeletal remains.
    Gonçalves D
    Homo; 2011 Oct; 62(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 21899836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chemosteometric regression models of heat exposed human bones to determine their pre-burnt metric dimensions.
    Gonçalves D; Vassalo AR; Makhoul C; Piga G; Mamede AP; Parker SF; Ferreira MT; Cunha E; Marques MPM; de Carvalho LAEB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Dec; 173(4):734-747. PubMed ID: 32722856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How "standardized" is standardized? A validation of postcranial landmark locations.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Nov; 59(6):1457-65. PubMed ID: 25069898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Dror IE; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24796950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Study on long bones: variation in angular traits with sex, age, and laterality.
    Gualdi-Russo E
    Anthropol Anz; 1998 Dec; 56(4):289-99. PubMed ID: 10027041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Identification of male somatotype based on osteometric characteristics of the upper and lower extremities].
    Zviagin VN; Sineva IM
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2009; 52(5):6-11. PubMed ID: 20058841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Error quantification of osteometric data in forensic anthropology.
    Langley NR; Meadows Jantz L; McNulty S; Maijanen H; Ousley SD; Jantz RL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():183-189. PubMed ID: 29698914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism.
    Ubelaker DH; DeGaglia CM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():407.e1-407.e7. PubMed ID: 28698063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Postcranial sex estimation of individuals considered Hispanic.
    Tise ML; Spradley MK; Anderson BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S9-14. PubMed ID: 23127214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of living stature from selected anthropometric (soft tissue) measurements: applications for forensic anthropology.
    Adams BJ; Herrmann NP
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 19486443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Reliable Regression-Based Approach for Reassociating Human Skeletal Elements of the Lower Limbs from Commingled Assemblages.
    Anastopoulou I; Karakostis FA; Moraitis K
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):502-506. PubMed ID: 30102760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative cortical bone thickness between the long bones of humans and five common non-human mammal taxa.
    Croker SL; Reed W; Donlon D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Mar; 260():104.e1-104.e17. PubMed ID: 26786143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison.
    Karell MA; Langstaff HK; Halazonetis DJ; Minghetti C; Frelat M; Kranioti EF
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Sep; 130(5):1315-22. PubMed ID: 26966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-dimensional imaging in forensic anthropology: a test study using the Macintosh.
    Ackermann RR
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Jan; 42(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 8988579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy Rates of Ancestry Estimation by Forensic Anthropologists Using Identified Forensic Cases.
    Thomas RM; Parks CL; Richard AH
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):971-974. PubMed ID: 28133721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new reference collection of documented human skeletons from Mérida, Yucatan, Mexico.
    Chi-Keb JR; Albertos-González VM; Ortega-Muñoz A; Tiesler VG
    Homo; 2013 Oct; 64(5):366-76. PubMed ID: 23830157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Craniometric diagnosis of skeletal and somatotype mass].
    Zviagin VN; Galitskaia OI; Aunapu SA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2002; 45(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 12516267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods.
    Quincey D; Carle G; Alunni V; Quatrehomme G
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23937932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Metric characterization of the human coxal bone on a recent Italian sample and multivariate discriminant analysis to determine sex.
    Vacca E; Di Vella G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):401.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22770620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.