BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683087)

  • 1. Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.
    Giger ML; Karssemeijer N; Schnabel JA
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 15():327-57. PubMed ID: 23683087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast image registration and deformation modeling.
    Boehler T; Zoehrer F; Harz M; Hahn HK
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2012; 40(3):235-58. PubMed ID: 22694202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer assistance for MR based diagnosis of breast cancer: present and future challenges.
    Behrens S; Laue H; Althaus M; Boehler T; Kuemmerlen B; Hahn HK; Peitgen HO
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007; 31(4-5):236-47. PubMed ID: 17369019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast image registration techniques: a survey.
    Guo Y; Sivaramakrishna R; Lu CC; Suri JS; Laxminarayan S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Mar; 44(1-2):15-26. PubMed ID: 16929917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
    Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compression paddle tilt correction in full-field digital mammograms.
    Kallenberg MG; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):703-15. PubMed ID: 22241616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
    Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
    Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical aspects of breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hylton NM; Kinkel K
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Feb; 9(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9617899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [MR mammography: current status and indications].
    Umschaden HW; Haselbach H
    Acta Med Austriaca; 1997; 24(2):39-45. PubMed ID: 9273806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
    Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphofunctional visualization of MR-mammography in virtual reality.
    Englmeier KH; Hellwig G; Griebel J; Delorme S; Siebert M; Brix G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():27-32. PubMed ID: 14663958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.