BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683089)

  • 1. Vehicle LATCH system features associated with correct child restraint installations.
    Klinich KD; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT; Manary MA; Moore JL; Wells JK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):520-31. PubMed ID: 23683089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vehicle characteristics associated with LATCH use and correct use in real-world child restraint installations.
    Cicchino JB; Jermakian JS
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():77-85. PubMed ID: 25934000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing tether anchor labeling and usability in pickup trucks.
    Klinich KD; Manary MA; Malik LA; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):287-291. PubMed ID: 29083943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observed LATCH use and misuse characteristics of child restraint systems in seven states.
    Decina LE; Lococo KH
    J Safety Res; 2007; 38(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 17617236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observed use of tethers in forward-facing child restraint systems.
    Jermakian JS; Wells JK
    Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 17(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 21422025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting tether use and correct use in child restraint installations.
    Jermakian JS; Klinich KD; Orton NR; Flannagan CA; Manary MA; Malik LA; Narayanaswamy P
    J Safety Res; 2014 Dec; 51():99-108. PubMed ID: 25453183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of child restraint system features on installation errors.
    Klinich KD; Manary MA; Flannagan CA; Ebert SM; Malik LA; Green PA; Reed MP
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 23731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) usability in school buses and passenger vehicles.
    Rudin-Brown CM; Scipione A; Armstrong J; Lai G; Salway A; Kumagai J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 18836959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of interventions to make top tether hardware more visible during child restraint system (CRS) installations.
    Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Baker GH; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(5):534-539. PubMed ID: 31194584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
    Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usability of non-standard lower anchor configurations for child restraint system (CRS) installation.
    Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S8-S13. PubMed ID: 30570335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
    Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of top tethers with forward-facing child restraints: observations and driver interviews.
    Eichelberger AH; Decina LE; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2014 Feb; 48():71-6. PubMed ID: 24529094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field use patterns and performance of child restraints secured by lower anchors and tethers for children (LATCH).
    Arbogast KB; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):530-5. PubMed ID: 17270136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of Child Restraint System (CRS) Compatibility in the Vehicle Seat Environment.
    Bing JA; Bolte JH; Agnew AM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S1-8. PubMed ID: 26436217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer usability of flexible vs. rigid lower anchor hardware in infant child restraint system (CRS) installations.
    Mansfield JA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S105-S110. PubMed ID: 35775879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Effect of a Mechanical Adjunct to Improve the Installation of Child Restraint Systems to Vehicles.
    Mirman JH; Seifert SJ; Zonfrillo MR; Metzger K; Durbin DR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S24-31. PubMed ID: 26436238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in child passenger safety practices in Indiana from 2009 to 2015.
    O'Neil J; Bull MJ; Talty J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S191-S194. PubMed ID: 29584489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of LATCH vs. non-LATCH installations for boosters in frontal impacts.
    Mansfield JA; Baker GH; Ramachandra R; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S93-S98. PubMed ID: 34379543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.