462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683156)
1. Validation of computer-administered clinical rating scale: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale assessment with Interactive Voice Response technology--Japanese version.
Kunugi H; Koga N; Hashikura M; Noda T; Shimizu Y; Kobayashi T; Yamanaka J; Kanemoto N; Higuchi T
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2013 May; 67(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 23683156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An examination of 26,168 Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores administered via interactive voice response across 17 randomized clinical trials.
Moore HK; Mundt JC; Modell JG; Rodrigues HE; DeBrota DJ; Jefferson JJ; Greist JH
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Jun; 26(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 16702899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized assessment of depression and anxiety over the telephone using interactive voice response.
Kobak KA; Greist JH; Jefferson JW; Mundt JC; Katzelnick DJ
MD Comput; 1999; 16(3):64-8. PubMed ID: 10439605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9, administered through interactive-voice-response technology.
Turvey C; Sheeran T; Dindo L; Wakefield B; Klein D
J Telemed Telecare; 2012 Sep; 18(6):348-51. PubMed ID: 22933480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.
Morriss R; Leese M; Chatwin J; Baldwin D;
J Affect Disord; 2008 Dec; 111(2-3):204-13. PubMed ID: 18374987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of an IVRS version of the MADRS.
Mundt JC; Katzelnick DJ; Kennedy SH; Eisfeld BS; Bouffard BB; Greist JH
J Psychiatr Res; 2006 Apr; 40(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15979643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale on an Iranian sample.
Shabani A; Akbari M; Dadashi M
Arch Iran Med; 2010 May; 13(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 20433226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Sexual dysfunction and depression: Validity of a French version of the ASEX scale].
Briki M; Haffen E; Monnin J; Tio G; Nicolier M; Sechter D; Vandel P
Encephale; 2014 Apr; 40(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 23827140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia.
Sarró S; Dueñas RM; Ramírez N; Arranz B; Martínez R; Sánchez JM; González JM; Saló L; Miralles L; San L
Schizophr Res; 2004 Jun; 68(2-3):349-56. PubMed ID: 15099616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.
Chiba R; Miyamoto Y; Kawakami N
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 19679304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Panic Disorder Severity Scale: reliability and validity of the Turkish version.
Monkul ES; Tural U; Onur E; Fidaner H; Alkin T; Shear MK
Depress Anxiety; 2004; 20(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15368591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression.
Rush AJ; Trivedi MH; Ibrahim HM; Carmody TJ; Arnow B; Klein DN; Markowitz JC; Ninan PT; Kornstein S; Manber R; Thase ME; Kocsis JH; Keller MB
Biol Psychiatry; 2003 Sep; 54(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 12946886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS): its development, validation and utility.
Berk M; Malhi GS; Cahill C; Carman AC; Hadzi-Pavlovic D; Hawkins MT; Tohen M; Mitchell PB
Bipolar Disord; 2007 Sep; 9(6):571-9. PubMed ID: 17845271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: a meta-analysis over a period of 49 years.
Trajković G; Starčević V; Latas M; Leštarević M; Ille T; Bukumirić Z; Marinković J
Psychiatry Res; 2011 Aug; 189(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21276619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric evaluation of a Patient-Rated Most Troubling Symptom Scale for Depression: findings from a secondary analysis of a clinical trial.
Pandina GJ; Garibaldi GM; Revicki DA; Kleinman L; Turkoz I; Kujawa MJ; Mahmoud RA
Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Mar; 25(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 20061962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using interactive voice response technology.
Mundt JC; Kobak KA; Taylor LV; Mantle JM; Jefferson JW; Katzelnick DJ; Greist JH
MD Comput; 1998; 15(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 9458661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of the Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale in adults.
Adler LA; Shaw DM; Spencer TJ; Newcorn JH; Sitt DJ; Morrill M; Davidow JV; Glatt SJ; Faraone SV
Compr Psychiatry; 2011; 52(6):769-73. PubMed ID: 21306705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in severely depressed patients.
Konstantinidis A; Martiny K; Bech P; Kasper S
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract; 2011 Mar; 15(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 22122690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and reliability of the HAM-D/MADRS interview: an integrated depression symptom rating scale.
Iannuzzo RW; Jaeger J; Goldberg JF; Kafantaris V; Sublette ME
Psychiatry Res; 2006 Nov; 145(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 17049379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
