These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683317)

  • 1. The effects of a convex rear-view mirror on ocular accommodative responses.
    Nagata T; Iwasaki T; Kondo H; Tawara A
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):1039-43. PubMed ID: 23683317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Convex rear view mirrors compromise distance and time-to-contact judgements.
    Hecht H; Brauer J
    Ergonomics; 2007 Apr; 50(4):601-14. PubMed ID: 17575717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accommodative response during distance optometric test procedures.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ; Rosen J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Sep; 63(9):614-8. PubMed ID: 1430751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of overlay symbology in night vision goggles on accommodation and attention shift.
    Schor CM; Task HL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1039-47. PubMed ID: 8908341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular visual acuity in intermittent exotropia: role of accommodative convergence.
    Ahn SJ; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 154(6):981-986.e3. PubMed ID: 22959882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses.
    Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D
    Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of viewing distance on accommodative and pupillary responses following a three-dimensional task.
    Iwasaki T; Tawara A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 Mar; 22(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 12014484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of target proximity on the aniso-accommodative response.
    Marran L; Schor CM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Sep; 19(5):376-92. PubMed ID: 10768019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic eye accommodation evoked by apparent distances.
    Takeda T; Iida T; Fukui Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jun; 67(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 2381687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accommodation response and visual discomfort.
    Tosha C; Borsting E; Ridder WH; Chase C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):625-33. PubMed ID: 19821926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximally induced accommodation and accommodative adaptation.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ; Ong E; Azimi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Jun; 31(6):1162-7. PubMed ID: 2354916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accommodative state of young adults using reading spectacles.
    Shapiro JA; Kelly JE; Howland HC
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 15581922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of rear-view mirror distance and curvature on judgements relevant to road safety.
    Hahnel UJ; Hecht H
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 22176482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical properties of plane and convex mirrors: investigation of mirror use to enhance construction flagger safety.
    Stevens E; Cohen M; Spielholz P
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 19272243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accommodative lag and fluctuations when optical aberrations are manipulated.
    Gambra E; Sawides L; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):4.1-15. PubMed ID: 19761295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of decreasing the radius of curvature of convex external rear view mirrors upon drivers' judgements of vehicles approaching in the rearward visual field.
    Fisher JA; Galer IA
    Ergonomics; 1984 Dec; 27(12):1209-24. PubMed ID: 6526002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between myopic and emmetropic children.
    Nakatsuka C; Hasebe S; Nonaka F; Ohtsuki H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 15944822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relation between accommodative facility and general binocular dysfunction.
    García A; Cacho P; Lara F; Megías R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 10829131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes.
    Ibi K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 9135812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error.
    Allen PM; O'Leary DJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(4):491-505. PubMed ID: 16009391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.