These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683410)

  • 41. Video sequence compared to conventional freeze image documentation: a way to improve the sonographic assessment of breast lesions?
    Földi M; Hanjalic-Beck A; Klar M; Seybold A; Mayer S; Saueressig U; Hasenburg A; Stickeler E; Watermann D
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Oct; 32(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 21294070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. ROC analysis of ultrasound tissue characterization classifiers for breast cancer diagnosis.
    Gefen S; Tretiak OJ; Piccoli CW; Donohue KD; Petropulu AP; Shankar PM; Dumane VA; Huang L; Kutay MA; Genis V; Forsberg F; Reid JM; Goldberg BB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12715993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
    Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
    Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
    Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing different ultrasound imaging methods for breast cancer detection.
    Ozmen N; Dapp R; Zapf M; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV; van Dongen KW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 25881342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
    Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of Malignancy Grade of Breast Cancer Using Perflubutane-Enhanced Ultrasonography.
    Masumoto N; Kadoya T; Amioka A; Kajitani K; Shigematsu H; Emi A; Matsuura K; Arihiro K; Okada M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 26895755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mammographic and ultrasonographic features of triple-negative breast cancer: a comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.
    Kim MY; Choi N
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 23761558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Combining support vector machine with genetic algorithm to classify ultrasound breast tumor images.
    Wu WJ; Lin SW; Moon WK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Dec; 36(8):627-33. PubMed ID: 22939834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Breast ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging of fibrotic changes of breast disease: correlations between elastography findings and pathologic and short Tau inversion recovery imaging results, including the enhancement ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient.
    Matsubayashi RN; Imanishi M; Nakagawa S; Takahashi R; Akashi M; Momosaki S; Muranaka T
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25299798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Classification of breast tumors using elastographic and B-mode features: comparison of automatic selection of representative slice and physician-selected slice of images.
    Moon WK; Chang SC; Chang JM; Cho N; Huang CS; Kuo JW; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1147-57. PubMed ID: 23562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
    Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reproducible surveillance breast ultrasound using an image fusion technique in a short-interval follow-up for BI-RADS 3 lesions: a pilot study.
    Nakano S; Ando T; Tetsuka R; Fujii K; Yoshida M; Kousaka J; Shiomi-Mouri Y; Imai T; Fukutomi T; Ishiguchi T; Arai O
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1049-57. PubMed ID: 24613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pure mucinous breast cancer-mammographic and ultrasound findings.
    Chopra S; Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Yeoman LJ; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Wilson AR
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Jun; 51(6):421-4. PubMed ID: 8654008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications.
    Balleyguier C; Ciolovan L; Ammari S; Canale S; Sethom S; Al Rouhbane R; Vielh P; Dromain C
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2013 May; 94(5):503-13. PubMed ID: 23619293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computerized scheme for assessing ultrasonographic features of breast masses.
    Kim KG; Cho SW; Min SJ; Kim JH; Min BG; Bae KT
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 15691726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: pathologic basis for differences in mammographic appearance.
    Wilson TE; Helvie MA; Oberman HA; Joynt LK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 7618541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.