160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683519)
1. Total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component: a registry-based analysis.
Niemeläinen M; Skyttä ET; Remes V; Mäkelä K; Eskelinen A
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 23683519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2193-8. PubMed ID: 27172865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.
DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early failure of cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components.
Meneghini RM; de Beaubien BC
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1505-8. PubMed ID: 23561931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component.
O'Keefe TJ; Winter S; Lewallen DG; Robertson DD; Poggie RA
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 19640673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components.
Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Iwaki H; Ikebuchi M; Inori F; Takaoka K
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):700-6. PubMed ID: 20194329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Excellent survival of all-polyethylene tibial components in a community joint registry.
Gioe TJ; Sinner P; Mehle S; Ma W; Killeen KK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():88-92. PubMed ID: 17589363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Hampton M; Mansoor J; Getty J; Sutton PM
Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 32731836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
Hu B; Chen Y; Zhu H; Wu H; Yan S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):666-674. PubMed ID: 27776898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component.
Hayakawa K; Date H; Tsujimura S; Nojiri S; Yamada H; Nakagawa K
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 23871406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years.
Kamath AF; Lee GC; Sheth NP; Nelson CL; Garino JP; Israelite CL
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1390-5. PubMed ID: 21872424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary results of an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
Helm AT; Kerin C; Ghalayini SR; McLauchlan GJ
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):941-4. PubMed ID: 18672343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full versus surface tibial baseplate cementation in total knee arthroplasty.
Galasso O; Jenny JY; Saragaglia D; Miehlke RK
Orthopedics; 2013 Feb; 36(2):e151-8. PubMed ID: 23379926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years.
Henricson A; Nilsson KG
Acta Orthop; 2016 Oct; 87(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 27357222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary meniscal-bearing knee replacements: 8- to 15-year followup.
Hartford JM; Harned ME; Kaufer H; Dobner JJ; Nicholls PJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():227-31. PubMed ID: 17828026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midterm Comparison of Tibial Fixation between Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and Substituting Porous Tantalum Total Knee Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.
Kaneko T; Kono N; Mochizuki Y; Hada M; Toyoda S; Ikegami H; Musha Y
J Knee Surg; 2021 Jan; 34(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 31288269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty for five years-a matched cohort study.
Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Ikebuchi M; Iwaki H; Inori F; Nakamura H
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1760-4. PubMed ID: 23642446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Despite Improved Survivorship of Uncemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis, Cemented Fixation Remains the Gold Standard: An Analysis of a National Joint Registry.
Nugent M; Wyatt MC; Frampton CM; Hooper GJ
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1626-1633. PubMed ID: 31031155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
