122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683665)
1. Comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors.
Chen W; Wang L; Yang Q; Liu B; Sun Y
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 23683665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors.
Lee SE; Lee WK; Kim DS; Doo SH; Park HZ; Yoon CY; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Choe G; Hong SK
World J Urol; 2010 Jun; 28(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 20119641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How does the radiographic size of a renal mass compare with the pathologic size?
Schlomer B; Figenshau RS; Yan Y; Bhayani SB
Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 16904439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of radiologic tumor volume and pathologic tumor volume in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Choi SM; Choi DK; Kim TH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Jeon HG
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122019. PubMed ID: 25799553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Partial elective nephrectomy].
Zungri E; Martínez L; Leal D; Lorenzo L
Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Mar; 36(3):160-4. PubMed ID: 21955560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Difference between clinical and pathologic renal tumor size, correlation with survival, and implications for patient counseling regarding nephron-sparing surgery.
Brookman-May S; Johannsen M; May M; Hoschke B; Gunschera J; Wieland WF; Burger M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 22021506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative imaging in renal masses: does size on computed tomography correlate with actual tumor size?
Ateş F; Akyol I; Sildiroglu O; Kucukodaci Z; Soydan H; Karademir K; Baykal K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2010 Dec; 42(4):861-6. PubMed ID: 20148365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of discordant radiologic and pathologic tumor size on renal cancer staging.
Kanofsky JA; Phillips CK; Stifelman MD; Taneja SS
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):728-31. PubMed ID: 17070342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal cell carcinoma: considerations for nephron-sparing surgery.
Lerner SE; Tsai H; Flanigan RC; Trump DL; Fleischmann J
Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):574-7. PubMed ID: 7716836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Discrepancy between radiological and pathological sizes of renal masses].
Huang JW; Dong BJ; Zhang J; Kong W; Xue W; Liu DM; Huang YR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 35(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 24119902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Augmented reality for image guided therapy (ARIGT) of kidney tumor during nephron sparing surgery (NSS): animal model and clinical approach].
Drewniak T; Rzepecki M; Juszczak K; Kwiatek W; Bielecki J; Zieliński K; Ruta A; Czekierda Ł; Moczulskis Z
Folia Med Cracov; 2011; 51(1-4):77-90. PubMed ID: 22891540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution of renal tumor growth rates determined by using serial volumetric CT measurements.
Zhang J; Kang SK; Wang L; Touijer A; Hricak H
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 19092093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-operative imaging may overestimate the kidney tumor size.
Nasseh HR; Falahatkar S; Ghanbari A; Bagheri Chenari H
Urol J; 2012; 9(4):662-6. PubMed ID: 23235970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal mass size: concordance between pathology and radiology.
Kathrins M; Caesar S; Mucksavage P; Guzzo T
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Sep; 23(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 23778129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic size versus surgical size of renal masses: which is the true size of the tumor?
Alicioglu B; Kaplan M; Yurut-Caloglu V; Usta U; Levent S
J BUON; 2009; 14(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 19650172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low local metastatic rate may widen indication of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.
Xiong ZQ; Zheng J; Feng CC; Bao Y; Ding Q; Fang ZJ
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 16(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 22209503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm.
Pahernik S; Roos F; Röhrig B; Wiesner C; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):71-4; discussion 74. PubMed ID: 17997423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and pathologic tumor size in renal cell carcinoma; difference, correlation, and analysis of the influencing factors.
Yaycioglu O; Rutman MP; Balasubramaniam M; Peters KM; Gonzalez JA
Urology; 2002 Jul; 60(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 12100917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography.
Roberts WW; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Chan TY; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):713-5. PubMed ID: 15711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
