122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683665)
21. Prevalence and predictors of benign lesions in renal masses smaller than 7 cm presumed to be renal cell carcinoma.
Akdogan B; Gudeloglu A; Inci K; Gunay LM; Koni A; Ozen H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2012 Jun; 10(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 22401753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The correlation between size of renal cell carcinoma and its histopathological characteristics: a single center study of 1867 renal cell carcinoma cases.
Zhang C; Li X; Hao H; Yu W; He Z; Zhou L
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E481-5. PubMed ID: 22540142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Small renal cell carcinomas: correlation of size with tumor stage, nuclear grade, and histologic subtype.
Hsu RM; Chan DY; Siegelman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 14975944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation of radiographic renal cell carcinoma tumor volume utilizing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging compared with pathological tumor volume.
Jorns J; Thiel DD; Arnold ML; Diehl N; Cernigliaro JC; Wu KJ; Parker AS
Scand J Urol; 2014 Oct; 48(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 24990768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of tumor volume on survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Seçil M; Çullu N; Aslan G; Mungan U; Uysal F; Tuna B; Yörükoğlu K
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(5):480-7. PubMed ID: 22618630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tumor size predicts synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: implications for surveillance of small renal masses.
Kunkle DA; Crispen PL; Li T; Uzzo RG
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1692-6; discussion 1697. PubMed ID: 17437785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of multidetector CT scans in staging of renal carcinoma.
Nazim SM; Ather MH; Hafeez K; Salam B
Int J Surg; 2011; 9(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20937417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term outcomes after nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm.
Peycelon M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Renard-Penna R; Vaessen C; Conort P; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Rouprêt M
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19012929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Enhancing renal masses with zero net growth during active surveillance.
Kunkle DA; Crispen PL; Chen DY; Greenberg RE; Uzzo RG
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):849-53; discussion 853-4. PubMed ID: 17296355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Significance of peritumoral vascularity on CT in evaluation of renal cortical tumor.
Zhang J; Lefkowitz RA; Wang L; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Russo P; Hricak H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17895782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robot-assisted laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for tumors over 4 cm: operative results and preliminary oncologic outcomes from a multicentre French study.
Masson-Lecomte A; Yates DR; Bensalah K; Vaessen C; de la Taille A; Roumiguié M; Doumerc N; Bruyère F; Soustelle L; Droupy S; Rouprêt M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):799-803. PubMed ID: 23566551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of surgical margins in renal cell carcinoma after nephron sparing: a comparative study: laparoscopy vs open surgery.
Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Terrone C; Bollito E; Fontana D; Scarpa RM
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1098-101. PubMed ID: 15758709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intraoperative ultrasonography: a useful tool in retrolaparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery.
Kang N; Niu Y; Zhang J; Wang J; Tian X; Yan Y; Yu Z; Xing N
Urol Int; 2012; 88(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 22441243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Significance of margin in nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma of 4 cm or less.
Li QL; Guan HW; Wang FP; Jiang T; Wu HC; Song XS
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Sep; 121(17):1662-5. PubMed ID: 19024095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Small renal tumors: correlation of clinical and pathological features with tumor size.
Pahernik S; Ziegler S; Roos F; Melchior SW; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):414-7; discussion 416-7. PubMed ID: 17561161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of segmental enhancement inversion on biphasic MDCT between small renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SH; Kim SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):598-604. PubMed ID: 23971452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contemporary imaging of patients with a renal mass: does size on computed tomography equal pathological size?
Kurta JM; Thompson RH; Kundu S; Kaag M; Manion MT; Herr HW; Russo P
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 18710440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinico-radio-pathologic features of a solitary solid renal mass at MDCT examination.
Kim EY; Park BK; Kim CK; Lee HM
Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1143-8. PubMed ID: 20849320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional tumour volume and cancer-specific survival for patients undergoing nephrectomy to treat pT1 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
Jorns J; Thiel DD; Lohse CM; Williams A; Arnold ML; Cheville JC; Leibovich BC; Parker AS
BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(7):956-60. PubMed ID: 22300498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma: an experience of clinical management for 31 cases.
Gong K; Zhang N; He Z; Zhou L; Lin G; Na Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 134(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 17846788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
