143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683727)
1. Unilateral vs bilateral hip bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Ikegami S; Kamimura M; Uchiyama S; Mukaiyama K; Kato H
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 23683727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving clinical decisions for women at risk of osteoporosis: dual-femur bone mineral density testing.
Cole RE
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2008 Jun; 108(6):289-95. PubMed ID: 18587077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral femoral bone mineral density measurements in Chinese women and men.
Xu H; Gong J; Chen JX; Zhang TM; Wu QL
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 17485033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone mineral density measurement at both spine and hip for diagnosing osteoporosis in Japanese patients.
Ikegami S; Kamimura M; Uchiyama S; Nakagawa H; Hashidate H; Takahara K; Kato H
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 19546017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Implications of Hip Flexion in the Measurement of Spinal Bone Mineral Density.
Ikegami S; Kamimura M; Uchiyama S; Nakamura Y; Mukaiyama K; Kato H
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 26778480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of measurement of the contralateral hip if the spine is not included in the bone mineral density analysis.
Cole R; Larson J
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 16785083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with hip and femoral neck dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in people with a spinal cord injury.
Schnitzer TJ; Wysocki N; Barkema D; Griffith J; Lent V; Romba M; Welbel R; Bhuva S; Manyam B; Linn S
PM R; 2012 Oct; 4(10):748-55. PubMed ID: 22841967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discordance between hip and spine bone mineral density measurement using DXA: prevalence and risk factors.
Mounach A; Abayi DA; Ghazi M; Ghozlani I; Nouijai A; Achemlal L; Bezza A; El Maghraoui A
Semin Arthritis Rheum; 2009 Jun; 38(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 18571696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Role of osteoporosis in trauma diagnostics].
Bitterling H; Vogel T; Dobler T; Mutschler W; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Eibel R
Rofo; 2005 Dec; 177(12):1663-9. PubMed ID: 16333789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12424634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of bone mineral density at distal radius on non-forearm osteoporosis identification.
Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 11460970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Appropriateness and limitations of bone mineral measurements by DXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) in the elderly--comparison with x-ray findings].
Suzuki T; Nagai H; Yoshida H; Kusumoto A; Ayano H; Kumagai S; Watanabe S; Shibata H; Yasumura S; Haga H
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1995 Jun; 42(6):385-97. PubMed ID: 7647356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preferred skeletal site for osteoporosis screening in high-risk populations.
Moayyeri A; Soltani A; Bahrami H; Sadatsafavi M; Jalili M; Larijani B
Public Health; 2006 Sep; 120(9):863-71. PubMed ID: 16870217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.
Sung KH; Choi Y; Cho GH; Chung CY; Park MS; Lee KM
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1111-1117. PubMed ID: 29404660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-related proximal femur bone mineral loss in South Indian women: a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
Anburajan M; Rethinasabapathi C; Korath MP; Ponnappa BG; Kumar KS; Panicker TM; Govindan A; Jagadeesan GN
J Assoc Physicians India; 2001 Apr; 49():442-5. PubMed ID: 11762616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in Thai women using the Osteosys Dexxum T-bone densitometer.
Pongchaiyakul C; Kotruchin P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Aug; 96(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 23991594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone mineral density distribution in the proximal femur and its relationship to morphologic factors in progressed unilateral hip osteoarthritis.
Kobayashi N; Inaba Y; Yukizawa Y; Takagawa S; Ike H; Kubota S; Naka T; Saito T
J Bone Miner Metab; 2015 Jul; 33(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 25449973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
