These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23683940)

  • 1. Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population.
    Perko T
    J Environ Radioact; 2014 Jul; 133():86-91. PubMed ID: 23683940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do lay people want to know about the disposal of nuclear waste? A mental model approach to the design and development of an online risk communication.
    Skarlatidou A; Cheng T; Haklay M
    Risk Anal; 2012 Sep; 32(9):1496-511. PubMed ID: 22324812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.
    González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is knowledge important? Empirical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries.
    Perko T; Zeleznik N; Turcanu C; Thijssen P
    Health Phys; 2012 Jun; 102(6):614-25. PubMed ID: 22570920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference levels in the context of Fukushima - lessons learned and a challenge for the radiation protection system.
    Sakai K
    Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):282-5. PubMed ID: 23089027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some lessons on radiological protection learnt from the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant.
    Kai M
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N101-5. PubMed ID: 22394670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Units related to radiation exposure and radioactivity in mass media: the Fukushima case study in Europe and Russia.
    Perko T; Tomkiv Y; Oughton DH; Cantone MC; Gallego E; Prezelj I; Byrkina E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):154-9. PubMed ID: 25389361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk communication discourse among ecological risk assessment professionals and its implications for communication with nonexperts.
    Hunka AD; Palmqvist A; Thorbek P; Forbes VE
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 23606562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The crucial role of nomothetic and idiographic conceptions of time: interdisciplinary collaboration in nuclear waste management.
    Moser C; Stauffacher M; Krütli P; Scholz RW
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jan; 32(1):138-54. PubMed ID: 21651596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived risks from radiation and nuclear testing near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan: a comparison between physicians, scientists, and the public.
    Purvis-Roberts KL; Werner CA; Frank I
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 17511698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An inquiry of the opinions of the French and Belgian populations as regards risk.
    Carlé B; Charron S; Milochevitch A; Hardeman F
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 111(1-3):21-7. PubMed ID: 15231344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond dose assessment: using risk with full disclosure of uncertainty in public and scientific communication.
    Hoffman FO; Kocher DC; Apostoaei AI
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 21979547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation in the workplace-a review of studies of the risks of occupational exposure to ionising radiation.
    Wakeford R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A61-79. PubMed ID: 19454806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology.
    Savadori L; Savio S; Nicotra E; Rumiati R; Finucane M; Slovic P
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1289-99. PubMed ID: 15563295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
    Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Fukushima radiation accident: consequences for radiation accident medical management.
    Meineke V; Dörr H
    Health Phys; 2012 Aug; 103(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 22951483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation epidemiology: a perspective on Fukushima.
    Boice JD
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):N33-40. PubMed ID: 22395193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Chernobyl accident as a source of new radiological knowledge: implications for Fukushima rehabilitation and research programmes.
    Balonov M
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 23295495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.