1729 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23684280)
1. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture force of cantilevered zirconia frameworks: an in vitro study.
Chong KK; Palamara J; Wong RH; Judge RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):849-56. PubMed ID: 24836535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
Klotz MW; Taylor TD; Goldberg AJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 22010078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 25976709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
