These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23684286)

  • 1. Tray modification for making impressions of mobile teeth.
    Çomut AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):341-2. PubMed ID: 23684286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method to make a preliminary impression of mobile teeth.
    Lee H; Park C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 19573690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material to correct a defect in complete denture definitive impressions.
    Oh WS; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 25444280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
    de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray.
    Hsu YT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Making a great impression.
    Mechanic E
    Dent Today; 2010 Dec; 29(12):88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 21229926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Two-stage Impression Technique for Making Edentulous Impressions of Maxillary Displaceable Fibrous Tissues.
    Antonelli JR; Hack SL; Georgescu M; Lopez KL
    Todays FDA; 2016; 28(2):68-9, 71. PubMed ID: 27220181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impression trifecta: three tools and tips for better impressions.
    Gottlieb M; Fagin M
    Todays FDA; 2011; 23(3):57-61. PubMed ID: 21568211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A technique to evaluate custom tray border extensions before peripheral molding.
    Namratha N; Shetty V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1603-4. PubMed ID: 25134997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Universal paradigms for predictable final impressions.
    Vakay RT; Kois JC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Mar; 26(3):199-200, 202-6; quiz 208-9. PubMed ID: 15813574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.