These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23684578)

  • 1. DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.
    Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Pretterklieber M; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1564-72; discussion 1564. PubMed ID: 23684578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
    Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
    Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DXA and pQCT predict pertrochanteric and not femoral neck fracture load in a human side-impact fracture model.
    Gebauer M; Stark O; Vettorazzi E; Grifka J; Püschel K; Amling M; Beckmann J
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 24019186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
    Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy digital radiography in the assessment of bone mechanical properties.
    Toljamo PS; Lammentausta E; Pulkkinen P; Tervonen O; Jämsä T; Nieminen MT
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Jan; 33(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22156238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combination of texture analysis and bone mineral density improves the prediction of fracture load in human femurs.
    Le Corroller T; Halgrin J; Pithioux M; Guenoun D; Chabrand P; Champsaur P
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 21739104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.
    Manske SL; Liu-Ambrose T; de Bakker PM; Liu D; Kontulainen S; Guy P; Oxland TR; McKay HA
    Osteoporos Int; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1539-45. PubMed ID: 16847586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for predicting fracture loads of the infant femur for injury investigation: an in vitro porcine model.
    Pierce MC; Valdevit A; Anderson L; Inoue N; Hauser DL
    J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 11149504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
    Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
    Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.
    Le Bras A; Kolta S; Soubrane P; Skalli W; Roux C; Mitton D
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 17097528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
    Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. pQCT bone strength index may serve as a better predictor than bone mineral density for long bone breaking strength.
    Siu WS; Qin L; Leung KS
    J Bone Miner Metab; 2003; 21(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 12928834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.
    Liebl H; Garcia EG; Holzner F; Noel PB; Burgkart R; Rummeny EJ; Baum T; Bauer JS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116907. PubMed ID: 25723187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural analysis of trabecular bone of the proximal femur using multislice computed tomography: a comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry for predicting biomechanical strength in vitro.
    Bauer JS; Kohlmann S; Eckstein F; Mueller D; Lochmüller EM; Link TM
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Feb; 78(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 16467973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
    Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
    Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of vertebral and femoral strength in vitro by bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites.
    Cheng XG; Lowet G; Boonen S; Nicholson PH; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1439-43. PubMed ID: 9738516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur.
    Lochmüller EM; Zeller JB; Kaiser D; Eckstein F; Landgraf J; Putz R; Steldinger R
    Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10326066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro.
    Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
    Bone; 2013 Jan; 52(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 22985891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
    Shawen SB; Belmont PJ; Klemme WR; Topoleski LD; Xenos JS; Orchowski JR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 12533581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.