These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685119)

  • 1. Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes.
    Jellinek S; Parris KM; Driscoll DA; Dwyer PD
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():69-76. PubMed ID: 23685119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions.
    Raymond CM; Brown G
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2513-23. PubMed ID: 21664035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program.
    Sorice MG; Haider W; Conner JR; Ditton RB
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):587-96. PubMed ID: 21488955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changing landowners, changing ecosystem? Land-ownership motivations as drivers of land management practices.
    Sorice MG; Kreuter UP; Wilcox BP; Fox WE
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 133():144-52. PubMed ID: 24374464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot.
    Banks-Leite C; Pardini R; Tambosi LR; Pearse WD; Bueno AA; Bruscagin RT; Condez TH; Dixo M; Igari AT; Martensen AC; Metzger JP
    Science; 2014 Aug; 345(6200):1041-5. PubMed ID: 25170150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa.
    Pasquini L; Cowling RM; Twyman C; Wainwright J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 19843125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A case study of landholder attitudes and behaviour toward the conservation of renosterveld, a critically endangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom, South Africa.
    Winter SJ; Prozesky H; Esler KJ
    Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 40(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17530328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of prescribed burn associations in the application of prescribed fires in rangeland ecosystems.
    Toledo D; Kreuter UP; Sorice MG; Taylor CA
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():323-8. PubMed ID: 24333743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The combined effects of remnant vegetation and tree planting on farmland birds.
    Cunningham RB; Lindenmayer DB; Crane M; Michael D; MacGregor C; Montague-Drake R; Fischer J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 18477028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
    Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sediment removal on vegetation communities in Rainwater Basin playa wetlands.
    Beas BJ; Smith LM; LaGrange TG; Stutheit R
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():371-9. PubMed ID: 23786876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes.
    Lepczyk CA; Mertig AG; Liu J
    Environ Manage; 2004 Jan; 33(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 14749899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carbon payments and low-cost conservation.
    Crossman ND; Bryan BA; Summers DM
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):835-45. PubMed ID: 21507060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context.
    Niemiec RM; Pech RP; Norbury GL; Byrom AE
    Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 59(3):477-489. PubMed ID: 28078387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction.
    Thomson JR; Moilanen AJ; Vesk PA; Bennett AF; Nally RM
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Jun; 19(4):817-28. PubMed ID: 19544726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia.
    Januchowski-Hartley SR; Moon K; Stoeckl N; Gray S
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():20-6. PubMed ID: 22705856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.