758 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685148)
1. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
McKay CM; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2664-73. PubMed ID: 7983272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitch of amplitude-modulated irregular-rate stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Long CJ; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1516-28. PubMed ID: 14514205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1777-85. PubMed ID: 7699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.
Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):368-79. PubMed ID: 11508961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.
Geurts L; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):713-26. PubMed ID: 11248975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site.
Stahl P; Macherey O; Meunier S; Roman S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1578. PubMed ID: 27106306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.
McKay CM; Henshall KR
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 19798533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.
Griessner A; Schatzer R; Steixner V; Rajan GP; Zierhofer C; Távora-Vieira D
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.
Kovačić D; James CJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 23(5):665-680. PubMed ID: 35918501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
