These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

756 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685148)

  • 1. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
    McKay CM; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2664-73. PubMed ID: 7983272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch of amplitude-modulated irregular-rate stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Long CJ; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1516-28. PubMed ID: 14514205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1777-85. PubMed ID: 7699159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.
    Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):368-79. PubMed ID: 11508961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):713-26. PubMed ID: 11248975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
    Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site.
    Stahl P; Macherey O; Meunier S; Roman S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1578. PubMed ID: 27106306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.
    McKay CM; Henshall KR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 19798533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.
    Griessner A; Schatzer R; Steixner V; Rajan GP; Zierhofer C; Távora-Vieira D
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.
    Kovačić D; James CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 23(5):665-680. PubMed ID: 35918501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.