These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

756 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685148)

  • 21. Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: effects on pitch ranking.
    Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):392-402. PubMed ID: 22779486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Garrett C
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pitch matching in bimodal cochlear implant patients: Effects of frequency, spectral envelope, and level.
    Maarefvand M; Blamey PJ; Marozeau J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):2854. PubMed ID: 29195427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
    Dorman MF; Spahr T; Gifford R; Loiselle L; McKarns S; Holden T; Skinner M; Finley C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 17351713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.
    Arslan NO; Luo X
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 450():109075. PubMed ID: 38986164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
    Macherey O; Deeks JM; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 12(2):233-51. PubMed ID: 21116672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
    Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
    Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.
    Wynne DP; George SE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):279-83. PubMed ID: 26233027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Zhang C; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9373979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Goldsworthy RL; Bissmeyer SRS; Camarena A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 34981263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.
    Kreft HA; Nelson DA; Oxenham AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 23632651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.