758 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685148)
21. Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: effects on pitch ranking.
Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):392-402. PubMed ID: 22779486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
Luo X; Garrett C
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pitch matching in bimodal cochlear implant patients: Effects of frequency, spectral envelope, and level.
Maarefvand M; Blamey PJ; Marozeau J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):2854. PubMed ID: 29195427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
Dorman MF; Spahr T; Gifford R; Loiselle L; McKarns S; Holden T; Skinner M; Finley C
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 17351713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
Macherey O; Deeks JM; Carlyon RP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 12(2):233-51. PubMed ID: 21116672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.
Wynne DP; George SE; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):279-83. PubMed ID: 26233027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
Zhang C; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9373979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Goldsworthy RL; Bissmeyer SRS; Camarena A
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 34981263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.
Kreft HA; Nelson DA; Oxenham AJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 23632651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.
Marimuthu V; Swanson BA; Mannell R
Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27094028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
