71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685746)
1. Dosimetric consequences of pencil beam width variations in scanned beam particle therapy.
Chanrion MA; Ammazzalorso F; Wittig A; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Jelen U
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):3979-93. PubMed ID: 23685746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion in scanned ion beam radiotherapy.
Ammazzalorso F; Graef S; Weber U; Wittig A; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Jelen U
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Jul; 112(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24833557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric robustness against setup errors in charged particle radiotherapy of skull base tumors.
Ammazzalorso F; Jelen U; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Schlegel W
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():279. PubMed ID: 25477197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of intrafraction prostate motion on proton pencil beam scanning delivery: a quantitative assessment.
Tang S; Deville C; McDonough J; Tochner Z; Wang KK; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 23958148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4.
Grevillot L; Bertrand D; Dessy F; Freud N; Sarrut D
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5203-19. PubMed ID: 21791731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas.
Weber DC; Trofimov AV; Delaney TF; Bortfeld T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 15050341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry estimation on variations of patient size in prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Chow JC; Jiang R
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 22819685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric consequences of tumour motion due to respiration for a scanned proton beam.
Kraus KM; Heath E; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(20):6563-81. PubMed ID: 21937770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robustness of IMPT treatment plans with respect to inter-fractional set-up uncertainties: impact of various beam arrangements for cranial targets.
Hopfgartner J; Stock M; Knäusl B; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):570-9. PubMed ID: 23244675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental characterization of lateral profiles of scanned proton and carbon ion pencil beams for improved beam models in ion therapy treatment planning.
Schwaab J; Brons S; Fieres J; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(24):7813-27. PubMed ID: 22112370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of penumbra sharpening and scattering by adaptive aperture for a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system.
Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1508-1519. PubMed ID: 33580550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introducing an on-line adaptive procedure for prostate image guided intensity modulate proton therapy.
Zhang M; Westerly DC; Mackie TR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):4947-65. PubMed ID: 21772078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy.
Tourovsky A; Lomax AJ; Schneider U; Pedroni E
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):971-81. PubMed ID: 15798269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breathing interplay effects during proton beam scanning: simulation and statistical analysis.
Seco J; Robertson D; Trofimov A; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):N283-94. PubMed ID: 19550002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
