These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685783)
21. Performance Characteristics of Long Axial Field-of-View PET Scanners with Axial Gaps. Daube-Witherspoon ME; Viswanath V; Werner ME; Karp JS IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci; 2021 May; 5(3):322-330. PubMed ID: 34179595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monte Carlo simulation of the system performance of a long axial field-of-view PET based on monolithic LYSO detectors. Abi-Akl M; Dadgar M; Toufique Y; Bouhali O; Vandenberghe S EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Jun; 10(1):37. PubMed ID: 37311926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Design Study of a Whole-Body PET Scanner with Improved Spatial and Timing Resolution. Surti S; Shore AR; Karp JS IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2013 Jul; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 24379455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance Characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT System with a Long Axial Field of View Using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard. Prenosil GA; Sari H; Fürstner M; Afshar-Oromieh A; Shi K; Rominger A; Hentschel M J Nucl Med; 2022 Mar; 63(3):476-484. PubMed ID: 34301780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Simulating NEMA characteristics of the modular total-body J-PET scanner-an economic total-body PET from plastic scintillators. Moskal P; Kowalski P; Shopa RY; Raczyński L; Baran J; Chug N; Curceanu C; Czerwiński E; Dadgar M; Dulski K; Gajos A; Hiesmayr BC; Kacprzak K; Kapłon Ł; Kisielewska D; Klimaszewski K; Kopka P; Korcyl G; Krawczyk N; Krzemień W; Kubicz E; Niedźwiecki S; Parzych S; Raj J; Sharma S; Shivani S; Stępień E; Tayefi F; Wiślicki W Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(17):. PubMed ID: 34289460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of event positioning algorithm on performance of a whole-body PET scanner using one-to-one coupled detectors. Surti S; Karp JS Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055008. PubMed ID: 29411709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Design study of fully wearable high-performance brain PETs for neuroimaging in free movement. Tao W; Weng F; Chen G; Lv L; Zhao Z; Xie S; Zan Y; Xu J; Huang Q; Peng Q Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(13):135006. PubMed ID: 32325449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance evaluation of the PennPET explorer with expanded axial coverage. Dai B; Daube-Witherspoon ME; McDonald S; Werner ME; Parma MJ; Geagan MJ; Viswanath V; Karp JS Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 36958051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. Chatziioannou AF; Cherry SR; Shao Y; Silverman RW; Meadors K; Farquhar TH; Pedarsani M; Phelps ME J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 40(7):1164-75. PubMed ID: 10405138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Design study of an in situ PET scanner for use in proton beam therapy. Surti S; Zou W; Daube-Witherspoon ME; McDonough J; Karp JS Phys Med Biol; 2011 May; 56(9):2667-85. PubMed ID: 21464528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Count rate performance of brain-dedicated PET scanners: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Teimoorisichani M; Goertzen AL Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215013. PubMed ID: 31530762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A virtual-pinhole PET device for improving contrast recovery and enhancing lesion detectability of a one-meter-long PET scanner: a simulation study. Jiang J; Hua J; Wang H; Yuan Z; Meng Y; Lu H; Liu S; Chen Y; Tai YC Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(14):. PubMed ID: 37336207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimization of an ultralow-dose high-resolution pediatric PET scanner design based on monolithic scintillators with dual-sided digital SiPM readout: a simulation study. Mikhaylova E; Tabacchini V; Borghi G; Mollet P; D'Hoe E; Schaart DR; Vandenberghe S Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8402-8418. PubMed ID: 28944759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. Brambilla M; Secco C; Dominietto M; Matheoud R; Sacchetti G; Inglese E J Nucl Med; 2005 Dec; 46(12):2083-91. PubMed ID: 16330574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Multi-center study of inter-scanner difference in brain positron emission tomography]. Oda K; Sakata M; Nishio T; Tsushima H; Tanizaki Y; Kato S; Ochi S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 22805443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monte Carlo simulation of sensitivity and NECR of an entire-body PET scanner. Isnaini I; Obi T; Yoshida E; Yamaya T Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jul; 7(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24366757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of a whole-body PET scanner using curve-plate NaI(Tl) detectors. Adam LE; Karp JS; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Smith RJ J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 42(12):1821-30. PubMed ID: 11752080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Active-PET: a multifunctional PET scanner with dynamic gantry size featuring high-resolution and high-sensitivity imaging: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Sanaat A; Jamalizadeh M; Khanmohammadi H; Arabi H; Zaidi H Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jul; 67(15):. PubMed ID: 35803249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Design Optimization of a TOF, Breast PET Scanner. Lee E; Werner ME; Karp JS; Surti S IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2013 Jun; 60(3):1645-1652. PubMed ID: 24078744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]