BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23685949)

  • 1. Spatial resolution characterization of differential phase contrast CT systems via modulation transfer function (MTF) measurements.
    Li K; Zambelli J; Bevins N; Ge Y; Chen GH
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4119-35. PubMed ID: 23685949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fundamental relationship between the noise properties of grating-based differential phase contrast CT and absorption CT: theoretical framework using a cascaded system model and experimental validation.
    Li K; Bevins N; Zambelli J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021908. PubMed ID: 23387756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).
    Tang X; Yang Y; Tang S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4467-82. PubMed ID: 22830779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scaling law for noise variance and spatial resolution in differential phase contrast computed tomography.
    Chen GH; Zambelli J; Li K; Bevins N; Qi Z
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):584-8. PubMed ID: 21452695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach.
    Fredenberg E; Danielsson M; Stayman JW; Siewerdsen JH; Aslund M
    Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5317-35. PubMed ID: 22957600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimisation of image reconstruction for phase-contrast x-ray Talbot-Lau imaging with regard to mechanical robustness.
    Seifert M; Kaeppler S; Hauke C; Horn F; Pelzer G; Rieger J; Michel T; Riess C; Anton G
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6441-64. PubMed ID: 27514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grating-based phase contrast tomosynthesis imaging: proof-of-concept experimental studies.
    Li K; Ge Y; Garrett J; Bevins N; Zambelli J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011903. PubMed ID: 24387511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical beam hardening and ring artifact correction for x-ray grating interferometry (EBHC-GI).
    Nelson BJ; Leng S; Shanblatt ER; McCollough CH; Koenig T
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1327-1340. PubMed ID: 33338261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correction of data truncation artifacts in differential phase contrast (DPC) tomosynthesis imaging.
    Garrett J; Ge Y; Li K; Chen GH
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7713-28. PubMed ID: 26394181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicontrast x-ray computed tomography imaging using Talbot-Lau interferometry without phase stepping.
    Bevins N; Zambelli J; Li K; Qi Z; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):424-8. PubMed ID: 22225312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of X-ray phase CT with a hybrid configuration of Lau and Talbot-Lau interferometers.
    Kageyama M; Okajima K; Maesawa M; Nonoguchi M; Nonoguchi M; Kuribayashi M; Hara Y; Momose A
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2021; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 33164981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction of phase artifacts in differential phase contrast computed tomography.
    Jerjen I; Revol V; Schuetz P; Kottler C; Kaufmann R; Luethi T; Jefimovs K; Urban C; Sennhauser U
    Opt Express; 2011 Jul; 19(14):13604-11. PubMed ID: 21747516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Helical differential X-ray phase-contrast computed tomography.
    Fu J; Willner M; Chen L; Tan R; Achterhold K; Bech M; Herzen J; Kunka D; Mohr J; Pfeiffer F
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 24518822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pitfall of using the circular-edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images.
    Narita A; Ohkubo M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 31957969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics.
    Higaki T; Nakamura Y; Zhou J; Yu Z; Nemoto T; Tatsugami F; Awai K
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 31818389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.
    Evans JD; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1444-58. PubMed ID: 21520856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interior tomography in x-ray differential phase contrast CT imaging.
    Lauzier PT; Qi Z; Zambelli J; Bevins N; Chen GH
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(9):N117-30. PubMed ID: 22491072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative coherence analysis with an X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometer.
    Wang Z; Zhu P; Huang W; Yuan Q; Liu X; Zhang K; Hong Y; Zhang H; Ge X; Gao K; Wu Z
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Jul; 397(6):2091-4. PubMed ID: 20306176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.