These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23686129)

  • 1. In defense of basic science funding: today's scientific discovery is tomorrow's medical advance.
    Tessier-Lavigne M
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2013 Jun; 3(6):. PubMed ID: 23686129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 1997 budget confirms US science faces a period of flat funding.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US science agencies dodge deep cuts.
    Semeniuk I
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7374):455-6. PubMed ID: 22113668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science in the national interest.
    Mikulski BA
    Science; 1994 Apr; 264(5156):221-2. PubMed ID: 8146650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science funding may be protected in next spending review, minister says.
    O'Dowd A
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3871. PubMed ID: 26187171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selling science: at what price?
    Lawler A
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5298):296-7. PubMed ID: 9005547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Policy. Science lobbyists aim for better balanced budget.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5510):1882-4. PubMed ID: 11245182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 2002 spending. First Bush budget may put science on diet.
    Malakoff D; Mervis J
    Science; 2001 Feb; 291(5508):1463-4. PubMed ID: 11234058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. UK government warned over 'catastrophic' cuts.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):420-1. PubMed ID: 20651661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A budget out of balance.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5512):2275. PubMed ID: 11269281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
    Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):279. PubMed ID: 11099007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinton's farewell gift to US science agencies.
    Macilwain C; Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6770):585. PubMed ID: 10688168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Debt crisis: Crunch time for US science.
    Gulledge J
    Nature; 2011 Sep; 477(7363):155-6. PubMed ID: 21900992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Budget numbers for US science looking up.
    Hand E; Wadman M
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):18. PubMed ID: 19262638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cutbacks 'will cripple space station science'.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):263. PubMed ID: 12124586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research funding. Science foundations: a novelty in Russian science.
    Dezhina I; Graham LR
    Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5755):1772-3. PubMed ID: 16357247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinton proposes $2.8 billion increase in science funding.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6768):349. PubMed ID: 10667757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. science budget. Obama's 2012 vision clashes with House cuts in 2011.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6019):832-3. PubMed ID: 21330499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speak up for science funding.
    Leshner AI; Woolley M
    Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6108):722. PubMed ID: 23139298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.