These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2368685)

  • 21. Research misconduct.
    Farthing MJ
    Gut; 1997 Jul; 41(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 9274461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scientific misconduct.
    Parmley WW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Dec; 22(75):2055. PubMed ID: 11654190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retractions by Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences due to Scientific Misconduct.
    Jawaid SA; Jawaid M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Aug; 26(8):718-9. PubMed ID: 27539774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scientific misconduct in cancer clinical trials.
    Emanuel EJ; Patterson WB
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Oct; 16(10):3433-8. PubMed ID: 9779723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fake bird fossil highlights the problem of illegal trading.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):696. PubMed ID: 10783860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
    Bosch X
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. 'Fumes from the spleen' on preparing a scientific poster.
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 24(6):514. PubMed ID: 20955228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].
    De Broe ME
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):335-41. PubMed ID: 15641564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliable References, Accountable Authors, and Steadfast Reviewers Mitigate Against Retracted Publications and Scientific Misconduct.
    Brand JC; Rossi MJ; Lubowitz JH
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1435-1436. PubMed ID: 28779791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific misconduct in cancer clinical trials.
    Vorobiof DA; Abratt R; Rapoport B; Ruff P; Slabber C; Goedhals L
    S Afr Med J; 2001 Aug; 91(8):614-5. PubMed ID: 11584765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
    Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
    Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Time to get down and dirty in defining misconduct.
    Caplan AL
    J Lab Clin Med; 1997 Feb; 129(2):172-3. PubMed ID: 9016851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Plagiarism is the emerged part of scientific misconduct].
    Maisonneuve H
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Jan; 32(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23246179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scientific misconduct: from salami slicing to data fabrication.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Mojon DS
    Ophthalmologica; 2004; 218(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14688428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
    Verma BL; Shukla GD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Britain's failure to tackle research misconduct: UK bodies are now working together to set up panel on misconduct.
    Lowe GD; Murray GD; Finlayson ND
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7433):229-30. PubMed ID: 14739207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific misconduct in a breast-cancer chemotherapy trial: response of University of the Witwatersrand.
    Cleaton-Jones P
    Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9208):1011-2. PubMed ID: 10768451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scientific misconduct. Psychologists rethink Burt.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6364):5. PubMed ID: 1538780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.