200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23687396)
1. Transgressive Hybrids as Hopeful Monsters.
Dittrich-Reed DR; Fitzpatrick BM
Evol Biol; 2013 Jun; 40(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 23687396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hybridization produces novelty when the mapping of form to function is many to one.
Parnell NF; Hulsey CD; Streelman JT
BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Apr; 8():122. PubMed ID: 18442407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The proper place of hopeful monsters in evolutionary biology.
Theissen G
Theory Biosci; 2006 Mar; 124(3-4):349-69. PubMed ID: 17046365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic Properties Responsible for the Transgressive Segregation of Days to Heading in Rice.
Koide Y; Sakaguchi S; Uchiyama T; Ota Y; Tezuka A; Nagano AJ; Ishiguro S; Takamure I; Kishima Y
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 30894452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic and epigenomic bases of transgressive segregation - New breeding paradigm for novel plant phenotypes.
de Los Reyes BG
Plant Sci; 2019 Nov; 288():110213. PubMed ID: 31521221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shape based assignment tests suggest transgressive phenotypes in natural sculpin hybrids (Teleostei, Scorpaeniformes, Cottidae).
Nolte AW; Sheets HD
Front Zool; 2005 Jun; 2():11. PubMed ID: 15987531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transgressive segregation in mating traits drives hybrid speciation.
Kagawa K; Takimoto G; Seehausen O
Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(7):1622-1633. PubMed ID: 37094817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is common in both natural and domesticated populations.
Rieseberg LH; Widmer A; Arntz AM; Burke JM
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2003 Jun; 358(1434):1141-7. PubMed ID: 12831480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation.
Rieseberg LH; Archer MA; Wayne RK
Heredity (Edinb); 1999 Oct; 83 ( Pt 4)():363-72. PubMed ID: 10583537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hybridization Outcomes Have Strong Genomic and Environmental Contingencies.
Brice C; Zhang Z; Bendixsen D; Stelkens R
Am Nat; 2021 Sep; 198(3):E53-E67. PubMed ID: 34403309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilites contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus.
Fishman L; Willis JH
Evolution; 2001 Oct; 55(10):1932-42. PubMed ID: 11761055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybridization and transgressive exploration of colour pattern and wing morphology in Heliconius butterflies.
Mérot C; Debat V; Le Poul Y; Merrill RM; Naisbit RE; Tholance A; Jiggins CD; Joron M
J Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 33(7):942-956. PubMed ID: 32255231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometry of two cryptic tree frog species at their hybrid zone reveals neither intermediate nor transgressive morphotypes.
Majtyka T; Borczyk B; Ogielska M; Stöck M
Ecol Evol; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e8527. PubMed ID: 35127036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Multigenerational Turing Model Reproduces Transgressive Petal Spot Phenotypes in Hybrid Mimulus.
Simmons ESG; Cooley AM; Puzey JR; ConradiSmith GD
Bull Math Biol; 2023 Nov; 85(12):120. PubMed ID: 37914973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral morphology: evidence for transgressive evolution in a derived hybrid lineage.
Anton KA; Ward JR; Cruzan MB
J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):660-73. PubMed ID: 23331370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid generation of ecologically relevant behavioral novelty in experimental cichlid hybrids.
Feller AF; Selz OM; McGee MD; Meier JI; Mwaiko S; Seehausen O
Ecol Evol; 2020 Jul; 10(14):7445-7462. PubMed ID: 32760540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic distance between species predicts novel trait expression in their hybrids.
Stelkens R; Seehausen O
Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):884-97. PubMed ID: 19220450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transgressive aggression in Sceloporus hybrids confers fitness through advantages in male agonistic encounters.
Robbins TR; Pruitt JN; Straub LE; McCoy ED; Mushinsky HR
J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 19682141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transgressive segregation, hopeful monsters, and phenotypic selection drove rapid genetic gains and breakthroughs in predictive breeding for quantitative resistance to
Knapp SJ; Cole GS; Pincot DDA; Dilla-Ermita CJ; Bjornson M; Famula RA; Gordon TR; Harshman JM; Henry PM; Feldmann MJ
Hortic Res; 2024 Feb; 11(2):uhad289. PubMed ID: 38487295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.
Thompson KA; Brandvain Y; Coughlan JM; Delmore KE; Justen H; Linnen CR; Ortiz-Barrientos D; Rushworth CA; Schneemann H; Schumer M; Stelkens R
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38151331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
