BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23687730)

  • 1. Assessment of penetration through vacuum cleaners and recommendation of wet cyclone technology.
    Seo Y; Han T
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Apr; 63(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 23687730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of debris accumulation on and filter resistance to airflow for four commercially available vacuum cleaners.
    Heitbrink WA; Santalla-Elias J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Jun; 6(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 19360515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Particle emission characteristics of filter-equipped vacuum cleaners.
    Trakumas S; Willeke K; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T; Mainelis G; Friedman W
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(4):482-93. PubMed ID: 11549143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do central vacuum cleaners produce less indoor airborne dust or airborne cat allergen, during and after vacuuming, compared with regular vacuum cleaners?
    van Strien RT; Driessen MN; Oldenwening M; Doekes G; Brunekreef B
    Indoor Air; 2004 Jun; 14(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 15104784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Typical household vacuum cleaners: the collection efficiency and emissions characteristics for fine particles.
    Lioy PJ; Wainman T; Zhang J; Goldsmith S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 10063262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of vacuum cleaners on the concentration and particle size distribution of airborne cat allergen.
    Woodfolk JA; Luczynska CM; de Blay F; Chapman MD; Platts-Mills TA
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Apr; 91(4):829-37. PubMed ID: 8473670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of filter bag, cyclonic, and wet dust collection methods in vacuum cleaners.
    Trakumas S; Willeke K; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA; Friedman W
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 11669383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test methods for evaluating the filtration and particulate emission characteristics of vacuum cleaners.
    Willeke K; Trakumas S; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T; Trunov M; Friedman W
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 11434437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the effect of conventional and filter vacuum cleaners on airborne house dust mite allergen.
    Hegarty JM; Rouhbakhsh S; Warner JA; Warner JO
    Respir Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 7597267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of vacuum cleaners and vacuum cleaner bags recommended for allergic subjects.
    Vaughan JW; Woodfolk JA; Platts-Mills TA
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1999 Nov; 104(5):1079-83. PubMed ID: 10550756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cleaning efficacy of high-efficiency particulate air-filtered vacuuming and "dry steam" cleaning on carpet.
    Yiin LM; Yu CH; Ashley P; Rhoads G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 18075882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum cleaner emissions as a source of indoor exposure to airborne particles and bacteria.
    Knibbs LD; He C; Duchaine C; Morawska L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(1):534-42. PubMed ID: 22084932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic monitoring of the dust pickup efficiency of vacuum cleaners.
    Reponen T; Trakumas S; Willeke K; Grinshpun SA; Choe KT; Friedman W
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2002; 63(6):689-97. PubMed ID: 12570075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of techniques to reduce residential lead dust on carpet and upholstery: the new jersey assessment of cleaning techniques trial.
    Yiin LM; Rhoads GG; Rich DQ; Zhang J; Bai Z; Adgate JL; Ashley PJ; Lioy PJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Dec; 110(12):1233-7. PubMed ID: 12460803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-efficiency vacuum cleaners increase personal mite allergen exposure, but only slightly.
    Gore RB; Durrell B; Bishop S; Curbishley L; Woodcock A; Custovic A
    Allergy; 2006 Jan; 61(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 16364166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field evaluation of an engineering control for respirable crystalline silica exposures during mortar removal.
    Collingwood S; Heitbrink WA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Nov; 4(11):875-87. PubMed ID: 17917951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of two different types of vacuum cleaners on airborne Fel d 1 levels.
    Rønborg SM; Poulsen LK; Skov PS; Mosbech H
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Mar; 82(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 10094223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical study of the effectiveness of filters in vacuum cleaners for reducing the concentration of dust mites in the household].
    Horak F
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1995; 145(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 7771098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Particle resuspension during the use of vacuum cleaners on residential carpet.
    Corsi RL; Siegel JA; Chiang C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Apr; 5(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 18247227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of ionic air purifiers for reducing aerosol exposure in confined indoor spaces.
    Grinshpun SA; Mainelis G; Trunov M; Adhikari A; Reponen T; Willeke K
    Indoor Air; 2005 Aug; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15982270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.