BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23688841)

  • 21. Characterization and validation of an in silico toxicology model to predict the mutagenic potential of drug impurities.
    Valerio LG; Cross KP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2012 May; 260(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 22426359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection of mutagenic impurities in carcinogens and noncarcinogens by high-pressure liquid chromatography and the Salmonella/microsome test.
    Donahue EV; McCann J; Ames BN
    Cancer Res; 1978 Feb; 38(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 340030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mutagens that are not carcinogens: faulty theory or faulty tests?
    Zeiger E
    Mutat Res; 2001 May; 492(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 11377241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The cancer threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) in relation to foodstuffs and pharmaceuticals: A potentially useful concept compromised by a dubious derivation.
    Snodin DJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2018 Aug; 37(8):789-802. PubMed ID: 29027486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Guidelines and pharmacopoeial standards for pharmaceutical impurities: overview and critical assessment.
    Snodin DJ; McCrossen SD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):298-312. PubMed ID: 22507740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern--guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet.
    Renwick AG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):585-91. PubMed ID: 16019047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assay of 855 test chemicals in ten tester strains using a new modification of the Ames test for bacterial mutagens.
    McMahon RE; Cline JC; Thompson CZ
    Cancer Res; 1979 Mar; 39(3):682-93. PubMed ID: 371791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identification of 'genotoxic' and 'non-genotoxic' alerts for cancer in mice: the carcinogenic potency database.
    Cunningham AR; Rosenkranz HS; Zhang YP; Klopman G
    Mutat Res; 1998 Feb; 398(1-2):1-17. PubMed ID: 9626960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A compilation of safety impact information for extractables associated with materials used in pharmaceutical packaging, delivery, administration, and manufacturing systems.
    Jenke D; Carlson T
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(5):407-55. PubMed ID: 25336416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanistic QSAR of aromatic amines: new models for discriminating between homocyclic mutagens and nonmutagens, and validation of models for carcinogens.
    Benigni R; Bossa C; Netzeva T; Rodomonte A; Tsakovska I
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2007 Dec; 48(9):754-71. PubMed ID: 18008355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: from structure-activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment.
    Benigni R; Passerini L
    Mutat Res; 2002 Jul; 511(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 12088717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A consortium-driven framework to guide the implementation of ICH M7 Option 4 control strategies.
    Barber C; Antonucci V; Baumann JC; Brown R; Covey-Crump E; Elder D; Elliott E; Fennell JW; Gallou F; Ide ND; Jordine G; Kallemeyn JM; Lauwers D; Looker AR; Lovelle LE; McLaughlin M; Molzahn R; Ott M; Schils D; Oestrich RS; Stevenson N; Talavera P; Teasdale A; Urquhart MW; Varie DL; Welch D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():22-28. PubMed ID: 28822875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Structure-activity models of chemical carcinogens: state of the art, and new directions.
    Benigni R; Bossa C
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 17033131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Setting health-based residue limits for contaminants in pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
    Conine DL; Naumann BD; Hecker LH
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 1344672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification, control strategies, and analytical approaches for the determination of potential genotoxic impurities in pharmaceuticals: a comprehensive review.
    Reddy AV; Jaafar J; Umar K; Majid ZA; Aris AB; Talib J; Madhavi G
    J Sep Sci; 2015 Mar; 38(5):764-79. PubMed ID: 25556762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet.
    Kroes R; Renwick AG; Cheeseman M; Kleiner J; Mangelsdorf I; Piersma A; Schilter B; Schlatter J; van Schothorst F; Vos JG; Würtzen G;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jan; 42(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 14630131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Carcinogenicity of mutagens: predictive capability of the Salmonella mutagenesis assay for rodent carcinogenicity.
    Zeiger E
    Cancer Res; 1987 Mar; 47(5):1287-96. PubMed ID: 3815340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutat Res; 1991 May; 257(3):229-306. PubMed ID: 1707500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mutagenicity assessment strategy for pharmaceutical intermediates to aid limit setting for occupational exposure.
    Araya S; Lovsin-Barle E; Glowienke S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 73(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 26454093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.