These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

628 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23688875)

  • 1. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1637-42. PubMed ID: 22789494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry.
    Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
    J Glaucoma; 2012; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 21654513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry.
    Sales-Sanz M; Arranz-Marquez E; Arruabarrena C; Teus MA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 256(1):173-179. PubMed ID: 29032414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects.
    Pelit A; Altan-Yaycioglu R; Pelit A; Akova YA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 18637107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements.
    Duba I; Wirthlin AC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 May; 221(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 15162277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses.
    Roszkowska AM; De Grazia L; Cirone M; Ferreri G
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 19321977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Mucke S; Osuagwu UL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23009324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of orthokeratology on intraocular pressure measurements.
    Chang CJ; Yang HH; Chang CA; Wu R; Tsai HY
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 28(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 23627528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals.
    Ito K; Tawara A; Kubota T; Harada Y
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21173706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.