These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23688902)

  • 1. Comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):969-70. PubMed ID: 23688902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply: comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Beiko G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):970. PubMed ID: 23688903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Beiko GHH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23098630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further assessment of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision.
    Xiao J; Li S; Jiang C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 May; 39(5):816-7. PubMed ID: 23608583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reply: Further assessment of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision.
    Beiko GH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 May; 39(5):817. PubMed ID: 23608585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Piñero DP; Plaza-Puche AB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1656-64. PubMed ID: 20870110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective accommodation measurement of the Crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Zamora-Alejo KV; Moore SP; Parker DG; Ullrich K; Esterman A; Goggin M
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 29(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 23380415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
    Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Javaloy J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):978-85. PubMed ID: 22624896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual function and spectacle independence after cataract surgery: bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision pseudophakia.
    Zhang F; Sugar A; Jacobsen G; Collins M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 May; 37(5):853-8. PubMed ID: 21511153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long-term results.
    Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Aydin N; Candemir B; Akçakaya AA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 38(8):768-77. PubMed ID: 20572819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Ortega P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1568-75. PubMed ID: 22906443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Marchini G; Mora P; Pedrotti E; Manzotti F; Aldigeri R; Gandolfi SA
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):2038-43. PubMed ID: 17555820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Findl O; Leydolt C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 17321405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
    Claoué C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pseudophakic monovision using monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: hybrid monovision.
    Iida Y; Shimizu K; Ito M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):2001-5. PubMed ID: 22018364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison.
    Zhao G; Zhang J; Zhou Y; Hu L; Che C; Jiang N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 20152611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of refraction, accommodation, and lens position after implantation of the 1CU accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens.
    Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Dec; 29(12):2324-9. PubMed ID: 14709293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: metaanalysis.
    Takakura A; Iyer P; Adams JR; Pepin SM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):380-8. PubMed ID: 20202533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical performance of monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Gatinel D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1817-8; author reply 1818. PubMed ID: 19006716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.