149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23690275)
1. Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.
Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Pashler H
Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):978-88. PubMed ID: 23690275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty.
Maddox GB; Balota DA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):760-74. PubMed ID: 25616776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term retention of a single word relies on retrieval from long-term memory when both rehearsal and refreshing are disrupted.
Rose NS; Buchsbaum BR; Craik FI
Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 24500778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering.
Dudukovic NM; Dubrow S; Wagner AD
Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 19744935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1516-23. PubMed ID: 24671778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Episodic context reinstatement promotes memory retention in older but not younger elementary schoolchildren.
Ma X; Li T; Li Z; Zhou A
Br J Dev Psychol; 2020 Jun; 38(2):304-318. PubMed ID: 31960469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty.
Klier C; Buratto LG
Neurosci Lett; 2023 Feb; 797():137066. PubMed ID: 36642238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Item Difficulty Affect the Magnitude of the Retrieval Practice Effect? An Evaluation of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis.
Lima MFR; Venâncio S; Feminella J; Buratto LG
Span J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23():e31. PubMed ID: 32772963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects?
Vaughn KE; Rawson KA; Pyc MA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1239-45. PubMed ID: 23589200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: the optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval.
Küpper-Tetzel CE; Kapler IV; Wiseheart M
Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):729-41. PubMed ID: 24500777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of emotion arousal in the retrieval practice effect.
Jia X; Gao C; Cui L; Guo C
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3241-3252. PubMed ID: 31646349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of tests on learning and forgetting.
Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Wixted JT; Vul E
Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):438-48. PubMed ID: 18426072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aging, spaced retrieval, and inflexible memory performance.
Bishara AJ; Jacoby LL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18605479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: when and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention.
Storm BC; Bjork RA; Storm JC
Mem Cognit; 2010 Mar; 38(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 20173196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The testing effect under divided attention: Educational application.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):558-575. PubMed ID: 31070392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?
Jönsson FU; Kubik V; Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Jonsson B
Psychol Res; 2014 Sep; 78(5):623-33. PubMed ID: 24173813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieval practice decreases processing load of recall: Evidence revealed by pupillometry.
Pajkossy P; Szőllősi Á; Racsmány M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():88-95. PubMed ID: 31301313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
Halamish V; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
Finn B; Roediger HL
Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
