These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23690275)

  • 21. Distinct episodic contexts enhance retrieval-based learning.
    Schwoebel J; Depperman AK; Scott JL
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1291-1296. PubMed ID: 29649927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1917-27. PubMed ID: 18265608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 19966244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability.
    Jang Y; Wixted JT; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R; Huber DE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):962-75. PubMed ID: 22304454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Practicing more retrieval routes leads to greater memory retention.
    Zheng J; Zhang W; Li T; Liu Z; Luo L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():109-18. PubMed ID: 27270228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A strategy disruption component to retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Dodd MD; Castel AD; Roberts KE
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 16686110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jan; 24(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 9438952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consolidation of episodic memories during sleep: long-term effects of retrieval practice.
    Racsmány M; Conway MA; Demeter G
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 20424027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.
    Abel M; Bäuml KH
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26286882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):704-19. PubMed ID: 17576148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial recall improved by retrieval enactment.
    Jones GV; Martin M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):524-8. PubMed ID: 19451379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion?
    Vaughn KE; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):897-909. PubMed ID: 27027887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.
    Moen KC; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():181-189. PubMed ID: 28214768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.