These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23691502)

  • 1. Effect of brain-to-skull conductivity ratio on EEG source localization accuracy.
    Wang G; Ren D
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():459346. PubMed ID: 23691502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
    Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between conductivity uncertainties and EEG source localization accuracy.
    Wang G; Yang L; Worrell G; He B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():4799-802. PubMed ID: 19963622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of skull-to-brain conductivity ratio for high resolution EEG source localization.
    Demoulin G; Pruvost-Robieux E; Marchi A; Ramdani C; Badier JM; Bartolomei F; Gavaret M
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34298528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validating EEG source imaging using intracranial electrical stimulation.
    Unnwongse K; Rampp S; Wehner T; Kowoll A; Parpaley Y; von Lehe M; Lanfer B; Rusiniak M; Wolters C; Wellmer J
    Brain Commun; 2023; 5(1):fcad023. PubMed ID: 36824389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
    Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of skull conductivity using SCALE head tissue conductivity estimation using EEG.
    Acar ZA; Makeig S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():4826-4829. PubMed ID: 36086241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Localization of deep brain activity with scalp and subdural EEG.
    Fahimi Hnazaee M; Wittevrongel B; Khachatryan E; Libert A; Carrette E; Dauwe I; Meurs A; Boon P; Van Roost D; Van Hulle MM
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117344. PubMed ID: 32898677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the effects of head modelling errors and measurement noise on EEG source localization accuracy in preterm newborns: A single-subject study.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Kazemi K; Wallois F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 58(3):2746-2765. PubMed ID: 37448164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
    Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG dipole source localization using artificial neural networks.
    Van Hoey G; De Clercq J; Vanrumste B; Van De Walle R; Lemahieu I; D'Havé M; Boon P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):997-1011. PubMed ID: 10795987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel method for calibrating head models to account for variability in conductivity and its evaluation in a sphere model.
    Schrader S; Antonakakis M; Rampp S; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245043. PubMed ID: 33113524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced conductivity dependence method for increase of dipole localization accuracy in the EEG inverse problem.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupre L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1430-40. PubMed ID: 21257364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.