These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23691647)

  • 1. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture.
    Fuller AK; Sutherland CS; Royle JA; Hare MP
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jun; 26(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 27509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved inferences about landscape connectivity from spatial capture-recapture by integration of a movement model.
    Dupont G; Linden DW; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3544. PubMed ID: 34626121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.
    Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications.
    Smith JB; Stevens BS; Etter DR; Williams DM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236978. PubMed ID: 32797083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reserve design to optimize functional connectivity and animal density.
    Gupta A; Dilkina B; Morin DJ; Fuller AK; Royle JA; Sutherland C; Gomes CP
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1023-1034. PubMed ID: 31209924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrated path for spatial capture-recapture and animal movement modeling.
    McClintock BT; Abrahms B; Chandler RB; Conn PB; Converse SJ; Emmet RL; Gardner B; Hostetter NJ; Johnson DS
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3473. PubMed ID: 34270790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model.
    Hostetter NJ; Regehr EV; Wilson RR; Royle JA; Converse SJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3772. PubMed ID: 35633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species.
    Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture.
    Glennie R; Borchers DL; Murchie M; Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1345-1355. PubMed ID: 31045249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal sampling design for spatial capture-recapture.
    Dupont G; Royle JA; Nawaz MA; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2021 Mar; 102(3):e03262. PubMed ID: 33244753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.
    Paterson JT; Proffitt K; Jimenez B; Rotella J; Garrott R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215458. PubMed ID: 31002709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.
    Dorazio RM; Karanth KU
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using imputation and mixture model approaches to integrate multi-state capture-recapture models with assignment information.
    Wen Z; Pollock KH; Nichols JD; Waser PM; Cao W
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 24571715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.