These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23692056)

  • 1. A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses.
    Pe'er G; Matsinos YG; Johst K; Franz KW; Turlure C; Radchuk V; Malinowska AH; Curtis JM; Naujokaitis-Lewis I; Wintle BA; Henle K
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):644-56. PubMed ID: 23692056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.
    Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity analyses of spatial population viability analysis models for species at risk and habitat conservation planning.
    Naujokaitis-Lewis IR; Curtis JM; Arcese P; Rosenfeld J
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 18798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critical appraisal of population viability analysis.
    Chaudhary V; Oli MK
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 31435956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporating evolutionary processes into population viability models.
    Pierson JC; Beissinger SR; Bragg JG; Coates DJ; Oostermeijer JG; Sunnucks P; Schumaker NH; Trotter MV; Young AG
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 25494697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sensitivity of population viability analysis to uncertainty about habitat requirements: implications for the management of the endangered southern brown bandicoot.
    Southwell DM; Lechner AM; Coates T; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):1045-54. PubMed ID: 18477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experiencing biodiversity as a bridge over the science-society communication gap.
    Meinard Y; Quétier F
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 24372716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methods and applications of population viability analysis (PVA): a review].
    Tian Y; Wu JG; Kou XJ; Wang TM; Smith AT; Ge JP
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2011 Jan; 22(1):257-67. PubMed ID: 21548317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population viability analysis with species occurrence data from museum collections.
    Skarpaas O; Stabbetorp OE
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 21284730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using global sensitivity analysis of demographic models for ecological impact assessment.
    Aiello-Lammens ME; Akçakaya HR
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):116-125. PubMed ID: 27029518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
    Himes Boor GK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity of population viability to spatial and nonspatial parameters using GRIP.
    Curtis JM; Naujokaitis-Lewis I
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Jun; 18(4):1002-13. PubMed ID: 18536258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A behaviorally explicit demographic model integrating habitat selection and population dynamics in california sea lions.
    González-Suárez M; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1608-18. PubMed ID: 18680502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clarity versus complexity: land-use modeling as a practical tool for decision-makers.
    Sohl TL; Claggett PR
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():235-43. PubMed ID: 23954777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing nature reserves in the face of uncertainty.
    McCarthy MA; Thompson CJ; Moore AL; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2011 May; 14(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 21371231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology.
    Brook BW; O'Grady JJ; Chapman AP; Burgman MA; Akçakaya HR; Frankham R
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6776):385-7. PubMed ID: 10746724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals. II. Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims.
    Galic N; Hommen U; Baveco JM; van den Brink PJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):338-60. PubMed ID: 20821698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of different population model structures for management of threatened plants.
    Regan HM; Bohórquez CI; Keith DA; Regan TJ; Anderson KE
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):459-468. PubMed ID: 27596063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.