241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23692065)
1. The evaluation of colon biopsies using virtual microscopy is reliable.
van der Post RS; van der Laak JA; Sturm B; Clarijs R; Schaafsma HE; van Krieken JH; Nap M
Histopathology; 2013 Jul; 63(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 23692065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies.
Jen KY; Olson JL; Brodsky S; Zhou XJ; Nadasdy T; Laszik ZG
Hum Pathol; 2013 May; 44(5):888-94. PubMed ID: 23199528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.
Weinstein RS; Descour MR; Liang C; Barker G; Scott KM; Richter L; Krupinski EA; Bhattacharyya AK; Davis JR; Graham AR; Rennels M; Russum WC; Goodall JF; Zhou P; Olszak AG; Williams BH; Wyant JC; Bartels PH
Hum Pathol; 2004 Nov; 35(11):1303-14. PubMed ID: 15668886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the use of digital images for a national prostate core external quality assurance scheme.
Harnden P; Coleman D; Moss S; Kodikara S; Griffin NR; Melia J
Histopathology; 2011 Oct; 59(4):703-9. PubMed ID: 22014051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience.
Krupinski EA; Tillack AA; Richter L; Henderson JT; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Graham AR; Descour MR; Davis JR; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2006 Dec; 37(12):1543-56. PubMed ID: 17129792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology.
Ozluk Y; Blanco PL; Mengel M; Solez K; Halloran PF; Sis B
Clin Transplant; 2012; 26(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 21955102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital reporting of whole-slide images is safe and suitable for assessing organ quality in preimplantation renal biopsies.
Eccher A; Neil D; Ciangherotti A; Cima L; Boschiero L; Martignoni G; Ghimenton C; Chilosi M; Giobelli L; Zampicinini L; Casartelli M; Brunelli M
Hum Pathol; 2016 Jan; 47(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 26547252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and evaluation of the virtual pathology slide: a new tool in telepathology.
Costello SS; Johnston DJ; Dervan PA; O'Shea DG
J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(2):e11. PubMed ID: 12857667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies.
Fine JL; Grzybicki DM; Silowash R; Ho J; Gilbertson JR; Anthony L; Wilson R; Parwani AV; Bastacky SI; Epstein JI; Jukic DM
Hum Pathol; 2008 Apr; 39(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 18234276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies.
Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Cronin AM; Al-Ahmadie HA; Gopalan A; Tickoo SK; Reuter VE; Fine SW
Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20970164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole slide imaging equivalency and efficiency study: experience at a large academic center.
Hanna MG; Reuter VE; Hameed MR; Tan LK; Chiang S; Sigel C; Hollmann T; Giri D; Samboy J; Moradel C; Rosado A; Otilano JR; England C; Corsale L; Stamelos E; Yagi Y; Schüffler PJ; Fuchs T; Klimstra DS; Sirintrapun SJ
Mod Pathol; 2019 Jul; 32(7):916-928. PubMed ID: 30778169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies.
Campbell WS; Hinrichs SH; Lele SM; Baker JJ; Lazenby AJ; Talmon GA; Smith LM; West WW
Hum Pathol; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1713-21. PubMed ID: 24913758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital vs traditional: Are diagnostic accuracy rates similar for glass slides vs whole slide images in a non-gynaecological external quality assurance setting?
Ross J; Greaves J; Earls P; Shulruf B; Van Es SL
Cytopathology; 2018 Aug; 29(4):326-334. PubMed ID: 29665117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
Evered A; Dudding N
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 20482714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Validation of a Whole-Slide Imaging Scanner in Cytological Samples: Diagnostic Accuracy and Comparison With Light Microscopy.
Bonsembiante F; Bonfanti U; Cian F; Cavicchioli L; Zattoni B; Gelain ME
Vet Pathol; 2019 May; 56(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 30686128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
Camparo P; Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M
APMIS; 2012 Apr; 120(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22429212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate needle biopsy examination by means of virtual microscopy.
Chargari C; Comperat E; Magné N; Védrine L; Houlgatte A; Egevad L; Camparo P
Pathol Res Pract; 2011 Jun; 207(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 21570778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy among dermatology residents during a simulated in-training examination.
Brick KE; Sluzevich JC; Cappel MA; DiCaudo DJ; Comfere NI; Wieland CN
J Cutan Pathol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 23808673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concordance between whole-slide imaging and light microscopy for routine surgical pathology.
Campbell WS; Lele SM; West WW; Lazenby AJ; Smith LM; Hinrichs SH
Hum Pathol; 2012 Oct; 43(10):1739-44. PubMed ID: 22591912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
