These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23692318)
21. Over 4100 protein identifications from a Xenopus laevis fertilized egg digest using reversed-phase chromatographic prefractionation followed by capillary zone electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Yan X; Sun L; Zhu G; Cox OF; Dovichi NJ Proteomics; 2016 Dec; 16(23):2945-2952. PubMed ID: 27723263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modified filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method increases peptide and protein identifications for shotgun proteomics. Ni MW; Wang L; Chen W; Mou HZ; Zhou J; Zheng ZG Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jan; 31(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 27794190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Trends in the Design of New Isobaric Labeling Reagents for Quantitative Proteomics. Bąchor R; Waliczek M; Stefanowicz P; Szewczuk Z Molecules; 2019 Feb; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 30781343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliable FASP-based procedures for optimal quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis on samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Hernandez-Valladares M; Aasebø E; Mjaavatten O; Vaudel M; Bruserud Ø; Berven F; Selheim F Biol Proced Online; 2016; 18():13. PubMed ID: 27330413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Deuterium-Free, Three-Plexed Peptide Diethylation for Highly Accurate Quantitative Proteomics. Jung J; Jeong K; Choi Y; Kim SA; Kim H; Lee JW; Kim VN; Kim KP; Kim JS J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1078-1087. PubMed ID: 30638020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. S-Trap, an Ultrafast Sample-Preparation Approach for Shotgun Proteomics. HaileMariam M; Eguez RV; Singh H; Bekele S; Ameni G; Pieper R; Yu Y J Proteome Res; 2018 Sep; 17(9):2917-2924. PubMed ID: 30114372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Deep Profiling of Proteome and Phosphoproteome by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, and Mass Spectrometry. Bai B; Tan H; Pagala VR; High AA; Ichhaporia VP; Hendershot L; Peng J Methods Enzymol; 2017; 585():377-395. PubMed ID: 28109439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Post-digestion ¹⁸O exchange/labeling for quantitative shotgun proteomics of membrane proteins. Ye X; Luke BT; Johann DJ; Chan KC; Prieto DA; Ono A; Veenstra TD; Blonder J Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():223-40. PubMed ID: 22665304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Single Cell Proteomics by Data-Independent Acquisition To Study Embryonic Asymmetry in Saha-Shah A; Esmaeili M; Sidoli S; Hwang H; Yang J; Klein PS; Garcia BA Anal Chem; 2019 Jul; 91(14):8891-8899. PubMed ID: 31194517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adding polyvinylpyrrolidone to low level protein samples significantly improves peptide recovery in FASP digests: An inexpensive and simple modification to the FASP protocol. Tremblay TL; Hill JJ J Proteomics; 2021 Jan; 230():104000. PubMed ID: 33011348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of protein and peptide fractionation approaches in protein identification and quantification from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Deng L; Handler DCL; Multari DH; Haynes PA J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2021 Jan; 1162():122453. PubMed ID: 33279813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Isobaric Labeling-Based LC-MS/MS Strategy for Comprehensive Profiling of Human Pancreatic Tissue Proteome. Liu CW; Zhang Q Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():215-224. PubMed ID: 28986817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasonic-Based Filter Aided Sample Preparation as the General Method to Sample Preparation in Proteomics. Carvalho LB; Capelo-Martínez JL; Lodeiro C; Wiśniewski JR; Santos HM Anal Chem; 2020 Jul; 92(13):9164-9171. PubMed ID: 32484334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sample Preparation for Relative Quantitation of Proteins Using Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) and Mass Spectrometry (MS). Erdjument-Bromage H; Huang FK; Neubert TA Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1741():135-149. PubMed ID: 29392697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Global combined precursor isotopic labeling and isobaric tagging (cPILOT) approach with selective MS(3) acquisition. Evans AR; Robinson RA Proteomics; 2013 Nov; 13(22):3267-72. PubMed ID: 24124127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Statistical identification of differentially labeled peptides from liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Cho H; Smalley DM; Theodorescu D; Ley K; Lee JK Proteomics; 2007 Oct; 7(20):3681-92. PubMed ID: 17879999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Determination of Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteome Variations by Isobaric Labeling Coupled with Strong Cation-Exchange Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Lachén-Montes M; González-Morales A; Fernández-Irigoyen J; Santamaría E Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2044():155-168. PubMed ID: 31432412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Isobaric Peptide Labeling on Digital Microfluidics for Quantitative Low Cell Number Proteomics. Leipert J; Steinbach MK; Tholey A Anal Chem; 2021 Apr; 93(15):6278-6286. PubMed ID: 33823593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]