These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23692475)

  • 41. Chemotography for multi-target SAR analysis in the context of biological pathways.
    Lounkine E; Kutchukian P; Petrone P; Davies JW; Glick M
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2012 Sep; 20(18):5416-27. PubMed ID: 22405595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Locally weighted learning methods for predicting dose-dependent toxicity with application to the human maximum recommended daily dose.
    Liu R; Tawa G; Wallqvist A
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 25(10):2216-26. PubMed ID: 22963722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Systematic assessment of scaffold distances in ChEMBL: prioritization of compound data sets for scaffold hopping analysis in virtual screening.
    Li R; Bajorath J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1101-9. PubMed ID: 22972561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by machine learning approaches.
    Tan NX; Rao HB; Li ZR; Li XY
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(1-2):27-75. PubMed ID: 19343583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prediction of P-glycoprotein substrates by a support vector machine approach.
    Xue Y; Yap CW; Sun LZ; Cao ZW; Wang JF; Chen YZ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1497-505. PubMed ID: 15272858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Classification of estrogen receptor-beta ligands on the basis of their binding affinities using support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis.
    Luan F; Liu HT; Ma WP; Fan BT
    Eur J Med Chem; 2008 Jan; 43(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17459530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Molecular descriptors influencing melting point and their role in classification of solid drugs.
    Bergström CA; Norinder U; Luthman K; Artursson P
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 12870909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Prediction of protein-protein interaction inhibitors by chemoinformatics and machine learning methods.
    Neugebauer A; Hartmann RW; Klein CD
    J Med Chem; 2007 Sep; 50(19):4665-8. PubMed ID: 17705363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 19301874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Classification of diverse organic compounds that induce chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster cells.
    McElroy NR; Thompson ED; Jurs PC
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(6):2111-9. PubMed ID: 14632463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Combining multiple classifications of chemical structures using consensus clustering.
    Chu CW; Holliday JD; Willett P
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2012 Sep; 20(18):5366-71. PubMed ID: 22484008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Artificial intelligence techniques for embryo and oocyte classification.
    Manna C; Nanni L; Lumini A; Pappalardo S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 23177416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 8. The prediction of human intestinal absorption by a support vector machine.
    Hou T; Wang J; Li Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2408-15. PubMed ID: 17929911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Active learning with support vector machine applied to gene expression data for cancer classification.
    Liu Y
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):1936-41. PubMed ID: 15554662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. On entropy-based molecular descriptors: statistical analysis of real and synthetic chemical structures.
    Dehmer M; Varmuza K; Borgert S; Emmert-Streib F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1655-63. PubMed ID: 19530677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Principles for 3D/4D QSAR classification of drugs.
    Potemkin V; Grishina M
    Drug Discov Today; 2008 Nov; 13(21-22):952-9. PubMed ID: 18721896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Simulation of sequential screening experiments using emerging chemical patterns.
    Auer J; Bajorath J
    Med Chem; 2008 Jan; 4(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 18220973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of Biological Screening Compounds with Single- or Multi-Target Activity via Diagnostic Machine Learning.
    Feldmann C; Yonchev D; Bajorath J
    Biomolecules; 2020 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33260876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Target family-directed exploration of scaffolds with different SAR profiles.
    Hu Y; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Dec; 51(12):3138-48. PubMed ID: 22091691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Development and testing of a compact basis set for use in effective core potential calculations on rhodium complexes.
    Roscioni OM; Lee EP; Dyke JM
    J Comput Chem; 2012 Oct; 33(26):2049-57. PubMed ID: 22707403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.