These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2369294)

  • 1. Nerve conduction studies: orthodromic vs antidromic latencies.
    Cohn TG; Wertsch JJ; Pasupuleti DV; Loftsgaarden JD; Schenk VA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Jul; 71(8):579-82. PubMed ID: 2369294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of interelectrode separation in sensory nerve conduction studies].
    Hasegawa O; Iino M; Matsumoto S; Yoshii T; Shimamura M
    No To Shinkei; 1999 Aug; 51(8):699-702. PubMed ID: 10478354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthodromic vs antidromic sensory nerve latencies in healthy persons.
    Chodoroff G; Tashjian EA; Ellenberg MR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Sep; 66(9):589-91. PubMed ID: 4038022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of interelectrode recording distance on morphology of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials at the finger.
    Wee AS; Ashley RA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 2311573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temperature effect on antidromic and orthodromic sensory nerve action potential latency and amplitude.
    Tashjian EA; Ellenberg MR; Gross N; Chodoroff G; Honet JC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Sep; 68(9):549-52. PubMed ID: 3632324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Median and ulnar muscle and sensory evoked potentials.
    Felsenthal G
    Am J Phys Med; 1978 Aug; 57(4):167-82. PubMed ID: 696811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Antidromic sensory action potentials of the median and ulnar nerve.--Normal value and discussion of methodology (author's transl)].
    Rosenberger K; Bittenbring G
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1976 Sep; 7(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 829058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of wrist thickness on amplitudes of sensory nerve action potentials.
    Chira-Adisai W; Yan K; Turan B
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 39(8):485-8. PubMed ID: 10627934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evoked sensory nerve action potentials: effect of different recording electrodes on distal latencies and amplitudes.
    Mondell DL; Kellner WS; Felsenthal G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Jan; 67(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 3942477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory nerve action potentials of the medial and lateral plantar nerve.
    Iyer KS; Kaplan E; Goodgold J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Sep; 65(9):529-30. PubMed ID: 6477086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New criteria for sensory nerve conduction especially useful in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Di Benedetto M; Mitz M; Klingbeil GE; Davidoff D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Sep; 67(9):586-9. PubMed ID: 3767631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of interelectrode distance on sural nerve action potential parameters.
    Plastaras CT; Marciniak CM; Sipple DP; D'Amore KG; Garvan C; Zaman SM
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Mar; 87(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18287816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiologic analysis of snap amplitude in orthodromic and antidromic studies.
    Meythaler JM; Tuel SM; Cross LL; Reichart RT; Wertsch JJ
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 34(6):323-9. PubMed ID: 8001471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Studies of sensory conductions. Comparison of latencies of orthodromic and antidromic sensory potentials.
    Murai Y; Sanderson I
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1975 Dec; 38(12):1187-9. PubMed ID: 1219082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between skin temperature and neuronal characteristics in the median, ulnar and radial nerves of non-impaired individuals.
    Moses B; Nelson RM; Nelson AJ; Cheifetz P
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(7-8):351-60. PubMed ID: 18051629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials obtained from all fingers on the same hand.
    Wee AS
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 42(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 11938595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study on the latency difference between compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials].
    Hasegawa O; Gondo G; Wada N; Matsumoto S; Mimura E
    No To Shinkei; 2001 Jun; 53(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 11436338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uni- and bipolar surface recording of human nerve responses.
    Winkler T; Stålberg E; Haas LF
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 2000104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of orthodromic and antidromic sensory nerve conduction. 2. Patients with polyneuropathies and polyradiculitis (author's transl)].
    Ludin HP; Lütschg J; Valsangiacomo F
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1977 Dec; 8(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 412654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivities of sensory nerve conduction study parameters in carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Prakash KM; Fook-Chong S; Leoh TH; Dan YF; Nurjannah S; Tan YE; Lo YL
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):565-7. PubMed ID: 17143144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.