These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23694681)
1. The preview benefit for familiar and unfamiliar faces. Persike M; Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G Vision Res; 2013 Jul; 87():1-9. PubMed ID: 23694681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual marking and facial affect: can an emotional face be ignored? Blagrove E; Watson DG Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):147-68. PubMed ID: 20364892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces. Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking. Meinhardt G; Persike M J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual working memory supports the inhibition of previously processed information: evidence from preview search. Al-Aidroos N; Emrich SM; Ferber S; Pratt J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):643-63. PubMed ID: 21988363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information. Keyes H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs. Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search. Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search. Osugi T; Murakami I Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces. Weibert K; Andrews TJ Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review. Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple contributions to priming effects for familiar faces: analyses with backward masking and event-related potentials. Dörr P; Herzmann G; Sommer W Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):765-82. PubMed ID: 21988383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Memory for friends or foes: the social context of past encounters with faces modulates their subsequent neural traces in the brain. Vrticka P; Andersson F; Sander D; Vuilleumier P Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(5):384-401. PubMed ID: 19637101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emotional stimuli capture spatial attention but do not modulate spatial memory. Bannerman RL; Temminck EV; Sahraie A Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 65():12-20. PubMed ID: 22664375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. Keyes H; Brady N Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition? Baird LM; Burton AM Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study. Sui J; Zhu Y; Han S Neuroreport; 2006 Mar; 17(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 16514370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images. Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli. Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception. Rossion B; Schiltz C; Robaye L; Pirenne D; Crommelinck M J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):1019-34. PubMed ID: 11595103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]