These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23694681)

  • 21. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
    Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Categorical perception for unfamiliar faces. The effect of covert and overt face learning.
    Kikutani M; Roberson D; Hanley JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 20483817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual search in temporally segregated displays: converging operations in the study of the preview benefit.
    Belopolsky AV; Peterson MS; Kramer AF
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 16099358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A psychophysical investigation into the preview benefit in visual search.
    Allen HA; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):735-45. PubMed ID: 17289105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Broadly tuned face representation in older adults assessed by categorical perception.
    Lee Y; Smith CR; Grady CL; Hoang N; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1060-71. PubMed ID: 24490946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of motion at encoding and retrieval for same- and other-race face recognition.
    Butcher N; Lander K; Fang H; Costen N
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):931-42. PubMed ID: 21988393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.
    Megreya AM; Burton AM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):865-76. PubMed ID: 17063917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond.
    Pierce K; Haist F; Sedaghat F; Courchesne E
    Brain; 2004 Dec; 127(Pt 12):2703-16. PubMed ID: 15319275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemispheric lateralization of posterior alpha reduces distracter interference during face matching.
    Okazaki YO; De Weerd P; Haegens S; Jensen O
    Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 1590():56-64. PubMed ID: 25285891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The commonality of neural networks for verbal and visual short-term memory.
    Majerus S; D'Argembeau A; Martinez Perez T; Belayachi S; Van der Linden M; Collette F; Salmon E; Seurinck R; Fias W; Maquet P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2570-93. PubMed ID: 19925207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Previewing distractors reduces efficiency of visual processing at previewed locations.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2014 Feb; 95():51-60. PubMed ID: 24368220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual marking: the influence of temporary changes on time-based visual selection.
    Watson DG; Compton S; Bailey H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1729-38. PubMed ID: 21517208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contextual cueing in preview search.
    Toh YN; Sisk CA; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2862-2875. PubMed ID: 32483660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selective interference on the holistic processing of faces in working memory.
    Cheung OS; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):448-61. PubMed ID: 20364929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach.
    Herzmann G; Schweinberger SR; Sommer W; Jentzsch I
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Sep; 41(5):688-701. PubMed ID: 15318875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sex difference in the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant social information: an event-related potential study of familiar face recognition.
    Wang J; Kitayama S; Han S
    Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 1408():41-51. PubMed ID: 21767827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.