115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23694700)
1. Adjusting for background mutation frequency biases improves the identification of cancer driver genes.
Evans P; Avey S; Kong Y; Krauthammer M
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2013 Sep; 12(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23694700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Somatic synonymous mutations in regulatory elements contribute to the genetic aetiology of melanoma.
Zhang D; Xia J
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Apr; 13(Suppl 5):43. PubMed ID: 32241263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DrGaP: a powerful tool for identifying driver genes and pathways in cancer sequencing studies.
Hua X; Xu H; Yang Y; Zhu J; Liu P; Lu Y
Am J Hum Genet; 2013 Sep; 93(3):439-51. PubMed ID: 23954162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The functional relevance of somatic synonymous mutations in melanoma and other cancers.
Gotea V; Gartner JJ; Qutob N; Elnitski L; Samuels Y
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res; 2015 Nov; 28(6):673-84. PubMed ID: 26300548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in human cancer-related genes undergo stronger purifying selections than expectation.
Chu D; Wei L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):359. PubMed ID: 30991970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An analysis of mutational signatures of synonymous mutations across 15 cancer types.
Bin Y; Wang X; Zhao L; Wen P; Xia J
BMC Med Genet; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):190. PubMed ID: 31815613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequent mutations in acetylation and ubiquitination sites suggest novel driver mechanisms of cancer.
Narayan S; Bader GD; Reimand J
Genome Med; 2016 May; 8(1):55. PubMed ID: 27175787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating mutational heterogeneity to identify genes that are enriched for synonymous mutations in cancer.
Rao Y; Ahmed N; Pritchard J; O'Brien EP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 24(1):462. PubMed ID: 38062391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular evolution of synonymous codon usage in Populus.
Ingvarsson PK
BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 8():307. PubMed ID: 18983655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On measuring selection in cancer from subclonal mutation frequencies.
Bozic I; Paterson C; Waclaw B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Sep; 15(9):e1007368. PubMed ID: 31557163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Domain landscapes of somatic mutations in cancer.
Nehrt NL; Peterson TA; Park D; Kann MG
BMC Genomics; 2012 Jun; 13 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S9. PubMed ID: 22759657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome.
Pleasance ED; Cheetham RK; Stephens PJ; McBride DJ; Humphray SJ; Greenman CD; Varela I; Lin ML; Ordóñez GR; Bignell GR; Ye K; Alipaz J; Bauer MJ; Beare D; Butler A; Carter RJ; Chen L; Cox AJ; Edkins S; Kokko-Gonzales PI; Gormley NA; Grocock RJ; Haudenschild CD; Hims MM; James T; Jia M; Kingsbury Z; Leroy C; Marshall J; Menzies A; Mudie LJ; Ning Z; Royce T; Schulz-Trieglaff OB; Spiridou A; Stebbings LA; Szajkowski L; Teague J; Williamson D; Chin L; Ross MT; Campbell PJ; Bentley DR; Futreal PA; Stratton MR
Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):191-6. PubMed ID: 20016485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The genomic landscape of cutaneous melanoma.
Zhang T; Dutton-Regester K; Brown KM; Hayward NK
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res; 2016 May; 29(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 26833684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. De novo discovery of mutated driver pathways in cancer.
Vandin F; Upfal E; Raphael BJ
Genome Res; 2012 Feb; 22(2):375-85. PubMed ID: 21653252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison and integration of computational methods for deleterious synonymous mutation prediction.
Cheng N; Li M; Zhao L; Zhang B; Yang Y; Zheng CH; Xia J
Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):970-981. PubMed ID: 31157880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying Epistasis in Cancer Genomes: A Delicate Affair.
van de Haar J; Canisius S; Yu MK; Voest EE; Wessels LFA; Ideker T
Cell; 2019 May; 177(6):1375-1383. PubMed ID: 31150618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Discovery of Mutated Driver Pathways in Cancer: Models and Algorithms.
Zhang J; Zhang S
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(3):988-998. PubMed ID: 28113329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integration of somatic mutation, expression and functional data reveals potential driver genes predictive of breast cancer survival.
Suo C; Hrydziuszko O; Lee D; Pramana S; Saputra D; Joshi H; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2607-13. PubMed ID: 25810432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations shapes patterns of polymorphism in Populus tremula.
Ingvarsson PK
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Mar; 27(3):650-60. PubMed ID: 19837657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying gene selection in cancer through protein functional alteration bias.
Brandes N; Linial N; Linial M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jul; 47(13):6642-6655. PubMed ID: 31334812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
