These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23694935)

  • 1. Network properties of decoys and CASP predicted models: a comparison with native protein structures.
    Chatterjee S; Ghosh S; Vishveshwara S
    Mol Biosyst; 2013 Jul; 9(7):1774-88. PubMed ID: 23694935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Network properties of protein-decoy structures.
    Chatterjee S; Bhattacharyya M; Vishveshwara S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2012; 29(6):606-22. PubMed ID: 22545992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Princeton_TIGRESS: protein geometry refinement using simulations and support vector machines.
    Khoury GA; Tamamis P; Pinnaduwage N; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2014 May; 82(5):794-814. PubMed ID: 24174311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SVR_CAF: an integrated score function for detecting native protein structures among decoys.
    Zhou J; Yan W; Hu G; Shen B
    Proteins; 2014 Apr; 82(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 24115148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ProVal: a protein-scoring function for the selection of native and near-native folds.
    Berglund A; Head RD; Welsh EA; Marshall GR
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 14696191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.
    Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr; 25(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 15011258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving protein secondary structure prediction using a multi-modal BP method.
    Qu W; Sui H; Yang B; Qian W
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Oct; 41(10):946-59. PubMed ID: 21880310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based classification of native and non-native protein-protein interactions: Comparing supervised and semi-supervised learning approaches.
    Zhao N; Pang B; Shyu CR; Korkin D
    Proteomics; 2011 Nov; 11(22):4321-30. PubMed ID: 22002942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Capturing native/native like structures with a physico-chemical metric (pcSM) in protein folding.
    Mishra A; Rao S; Mittal A; Jayaram B
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2013 Aug; 1834(8):1520-31. PubMed ID: 23665455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein structure evaluation using an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function.
    Narang P; Bhushan K; Bose S; Jayaram B
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2006 Feb; 23(4):385-406. PubMed ID: 16363875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of methods for predicting the topology of beta-barrel outer membrane proteins and a consensus prediction method.
    Bagos PG; Liakopoulos TD; Hamodrakas SJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():7. PubMed ID: 15647112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absolute quality evaluation of protein model structures using statistical potentials with respect to the native and reference states.
    Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
    Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1550-63. PubMed ID: 21365682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
    Dominy BN; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Huang ES; Subbiah S; Tsai J; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Apr; 257(3):716-25. PubMed ID: 8648635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scoring predictive models using a reduced representation of proteins: model and energy definition.
    Fogolari F; Pieri L; Dovier A; Bortolussi L; Giugliarelli G; Corazza A; Esposito G; Viglino P
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Mar; 7():15. PubMed ID: 17378941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A global machine learning based scoring function for protein structure prediction.
    Faraggi E; Kloczkowski A
    Proteins; 2014 May; 82(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 24264942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using correlated parameters for improved ranking of protein-protein docking decoys.
    Mitra P; Pal D
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):787-96. PubMed ID: 20941737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a new meta-score for protein structure prediction from seven all-atom distance dependent potentials using support vector regression.
    Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
    Genome Inform; 2009 Oct; 23(1):149-58. PubMed ID: 20180270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.