These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2369516)

  • 1. A field intercomparison and fundamental characterization of various dust samplers with a reference sampler.
    Holländer W; Morawietz G; Bake D; Laskus L; van Elzakker BG; van der Meulen A; Zierock KH
    J Air Waste Manage Assoc; 1990 Jun; 40(6):881-6. PubMed ID: 2369516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative measurements of suspended particulates using several gravimetric methods and the British smoke sampler.
    Laskus L
    Sci Total Environ; 1983 Oct; 31(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 6658441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Report on measures by the Commission of the European Community for the conversion of Article 10 of the guidelines on limit and leading values for SO2 and suspended dust].
    Zierock KH
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1984; 59():129-43. PubMed ID: 6528242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of performance standards to personal airborne dust samplers.
    Kenny LC; Lidén G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1989; 33(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 2802447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.
    Anthony TR; Cai C; Mehaffy J; Sleeth D; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 27792469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harmonization problems in the implemention of the EEC directive on air quality limit values and guide values for sulphur dioxide and suspended particulates.
    Zierock KH; Smeets J; Stief-Tauch HP
    Environ Monit Assess; 1985 Sep; 5(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 24258032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field comparison of inhalable and total dust samplers for assessing airborne dust in swine confinement barns.
    Predicala BZ; Maghirang RG
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 12909537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study of fifteen respirable aerosol samplers used in occupational hygiene.
    Görner P; Wrobel R; Micka V; Skoda V; Denis J; Fabriès JF
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 11137698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the european rubber manufacturing industry.
    de Vocht F; Huizer D; Prause M; Jakobsson K; Peplonska B; Straif K; Kromhout H
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2006 Sep; 79(8):621-9. PubMed ID: 16506045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
    Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the applicability of a semi-continuous aerosol sampler to measure Asian dust particles.
    Son SC; Park SS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Mar; 17(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 25601751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sampling Efficiency and Performance of Selected Thoracic Aerosol Samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Boivin A; Bau S
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):784-796. PubMed ID: 28810686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of measured total suspended particulate matter concentrations using tapered element oscillating microbalance and a total suspended particulate sampler.
    Jerez SB; Zhang Y; McClure JW; Jacobson L; Heber A; Hoff S; Koziel J; Beasley D
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Mar; 56(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 16573189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Distribution of particle size and quality of suspended dust in smog episodes].
    Israël G
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1986; 69():93-105. PubMed ID: 3726490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.