These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23695823)

  • 1. Prospective validation that vulnerable plaque associated with major adverse outcomes have larger plaque volume, less dense calcium, and more non-calcified plaque by quantitative, three-dimensional measurements using intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis : results from the ATLANTA I Study.
    Vazquez-Figueroa JG; Rinehart S; Qian Z; Joshi PH; Sharma A; Lee J; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Taylor K; Ballard W; Karmpaliotis D; Kalynych A; Brown C; Voros S
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2013 Oct; 6(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23695823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study.
    Voros S; Rinehart S; Qian Z; Vazquez G; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Taylor K; Ballard W; Karmpaliotis D; Kalynych A; Brown C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Feb; 4(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 21349459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apoprotein B, small-dense LDL and impaired HDL remodeling is associated with larger plaque burden and more noncalcified plaque as assessed by coronary CT angiography and intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter: results from the ATLANTA I study.
    Voros S; Joshi P; Qian Z; Rinehart S; Vazquez-Figueroa JG; Anderson H; Elashoff M; Murrieta L; Karmpaliotis D; Kalynych A; Brown C; Schaefer E; Asztalos B
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2013 Nov; 2(6):e000344. PubMed ID: 24252842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerosis with computed tomography coronary angiography: cross-correlation with intravascular ultrasound virtual histology.
    de Graaf MA; Broersen A; Kitslaar PH; Roos CJ; Dijkstra J; Lelieveldt BP; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; Delgado V; Bax JJ; Reiber JH; Scholte AJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):1177-90. PubMed ID: 23417447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tissue characterization and phenotype classification in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the iWonder study.
    Souza CF; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Matsumura M; Alves CMR; Carlos Carvalho A; Caixeta A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 28191713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events.
    Tesche C; Plank F; De Cecco CN; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Yang J; Jacks IL; Gramer BM; Ebersberger U; Hoffmann E; Chiaramida SA; Feuchtner G; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(6):458-465. PubMed ID: 27522574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive value of the QFR in detecting vulnerable plaques in non-flow limiting lesions: a combined analysis of the PROSPECT and IBIS-4 study.
    Safi H; Bourantas CV; Ramasamy A; Zanchin T; Bär S; Tufaro V; Jin C; Torii R; Karagiannis A; Reiber JHC; Mathur A; Onuma Y; Windecker S; Lansky A; Maehara A; Serruys PW; Stone P; Baumbach A; Stone GW; Räber L
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):993-1002. PubMed ID: 32152810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Definitions and methodology for the grayscale and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiographic analyses.
    Maehara A; Cristea E; Mintz GS; Lansky AJ; Dressler O; Biro S; Templin B; Virmani R; de Bruyne B; Serruys PW; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 5(3 Suppl):S1-9. PubMed ID: 22421222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incremental prognostic value of quantitative plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography during 5 years of follow up.
    Nadjiri J; Hausleiter J; Jähnichen C; Will A; Hendrich E; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 26837235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
    Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-fibroatheroma lesion phenotype and long-term clinical outcomes: a substudy analysis from the PROSPECT study.
    Dohi T; Mintz GS; McPherson JA; de Bruyne B; Farhat NZ; Lansky AJ; Mehran R; Weisz G; Xu K; Stone GW; Maehara A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Aug; 6(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 23850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel method for non-invasive plaque morphology analysis by coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Fujimoto S; Kondo T; Kodama T; Fujisawa Y; Groarke J; Kumamaru KK; Takamura K; Matsunaga E; Miyauchi K; Daida H; Rybicki FJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Oct; 30(7):1373-82. PubMed ID: 24894361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coronary plaque progression of non-culprit lesions after culprit percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease: intravascular ultrasound and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound study.
    Kashiyama K; Sonoda S; Muraoka Y; Suzuki Y; Kamezaki F; Tsuda Y; Araki M; Tamura M; Takeuchi M; Abe H; Okazaki M; Fujino Y; Otsuji Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31(5):935-45. PubMed ID: 25724567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced characterization of calcified areas in intravascular ultrasound virtual histology images by quantification of the acoustic shadow: validation against computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Broersen A; de Graaf MA; Eggermont J; Wolterbeek R; Kitslaar PH; Dijkstra J; Bax JJ; Reiber JH; Scholte AJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):543-52. PubMed ID: 26667446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adiponectin in Relation to Coronary Plaque Characteristics on Radiofrequency Intravascular Ultrasound and Cardiovascular Outcome.
    Marino BCA; Buljubasic N; Akkerhuis M; Cheng JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Regar E; Geuns RV; Serruys PW; Boersma E; Kardys I
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 111(3):345-353. PubMed ID: 30379252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head-to-head comparison of coronary plaque evaluation between multislice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.
    Pundziute G; Schuijf JD; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Sarno G; Vanhoenacker PK; Reiber JH; Schalij MJ; Wijns W; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 19463297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atherosclerotic plaque composition and classification identified by coronary computed tomography: assessment of computed tomography-generated plaque maps compared with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and histology.
    Obaid DR; Calvert PA; Gopalan D; Parker RA; Hoole SP; West NE; Goddard M; Rudd JH; Bennett MR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 23960215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of positive and negative lesion site remodeling on clinical outcomes: insights from PROSPECT.
    Inaba S; Mintz GS; Farhat NZ; Fajadet J; Dudek D; Marzocchi A; Templin B; Weisz G; Xu K; de Bruyne B; Serruys PW; Stone GW; Maehara A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 24433710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A three-dimensional quantification of calcified and non-calcified plaques in coronary arteries based on computed tomography coronary angiography images: Comparison with expert's annotations and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.
    Kigka VI; Sakellarios A; Kyriakidis S; Rigas G; Athanasiou L; Siogkas P; Tsompou P; Loggitsi D; Benz DC; Buechel R; Lemos PA; Pelosi G; Michalis LK; Fotiadis DI
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Oct; 113():103409. PubMed ID: 31480007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plaque Structural Stress Estimations Improve Prediction of Future Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Intracoronary Imaging.
    Brown AJ; Teng Z; Calvert PA; Rajani NK; Hennessy O; Nerlekar N; Obaid DR; Costopoulos C; Huang Y; Hoole SP; Goddard M; West NE; Gillard JH; Bennett MR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27307548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.